UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________________ TO ______________________

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-32037

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

DELAWARE   65-0963722

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

1030 BROAD STREET, SUITE 102,

SHREWSBURY, NJ

  07702
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

(561) 988-1988
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒   No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒   No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company
    Emerging growth company ☒ 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐   No ☒

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 312,289,757 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding as of August 9, 2017. 

 

 

 

 

 

  

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

    Page No.
  PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
     
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. 1
     
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 53
     
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 61
     
Item 4. Controls and Procedures. 61
     
  PART II. - OTHER INFORMATION  
     
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. 62
     
Item 1A. Risk Factors. 62
     
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. 62
     
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. 62
     
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. 62
     
Item 5. Other Information. 62
     
Item 6. Exhibits. 63

 

 

 

  

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “predicts,” “potential,” or the negative of those terms, and similar expressions and comparable terminology. These include, but are not limited to, statements relating to future events or our future financial and operating results, plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these expectations may not be achieved. Forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors outside of our control that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

 

You should consider the areas of risk described in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made herein. You should also consider carefully the statements under Item 1A. Risk Factors appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2017, which address additional factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include:

 

  our ability to successfully execute our business strategies, including the acquisition of other businesses to grow our company and integration of future acquisitions;
     
  our ability to obtain additional financing in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms when required;
     
  changes in aggregate capital spending, cyclicality and other economic conditions, and domestic and international demand in the industries we serve;
     
  our ability to adopt and master new technologies and adjust certain fixed costs and expenses to adapt to our industry’s and customers’ evolving demands;
     
  our ability to adequately expand our sales force and attract and retain key personnel and skilled labor;
     
  shifts in geographic concentration of our customers, supplies and labor pools and seasonal fluctuations in demand for our services;
     
  our dependence on third-party subcontractors to perform some of the work on our contracts;
     
  our competitors developing the expertise, experience and resources to provide services that are equal or superior in both price and quality to our services;
     
  our material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and our ability to maintain effective controls over financial reporting in the future;
     
  our ability to comply with certain financial covenants of our debt obligations;
     
  the impact of new or changed laws, regulations or other industry standards that could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business;
     
  changes in general market, economic and political conditions in the United States and global economies or financial markets, including those resulting from natural or man-made disasters;
     
  we may incur goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges, which could harm our profitability; and
     
  we have doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

  

 

 

  

These risk factors also should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue. All written and oral forward looking statements made in connection with this report that are attributable to our company or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Given these uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements and you should carefully review this report in its entirety. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and you should not rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business.

 

Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events. We do not undertake any obligation to review or confirm analysts’ expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by applicable law or regulation.

 

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

 

Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, when used in this report the terms “we”, “our”, the “Company” and similar terms refer to InterCloud Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

The information that appears on our web site at www.InterCloudsys.com is not part of this report.

  

 

 

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements.

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

 

   June 30,   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (Unaudited)     
ASSETS        
Current Assets:        
Cash  $407   $1,790 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,026 and $914, respectively   8,459    13,952 
Inventory, net of reserves of $263 and $84, respectively   -    165 
Loans receivable, net of reserves of $891 and $891, respectively   2,319    382 
Other current assets   4,915    2,100 
Total current assets   16,100    18,389 
           
Property and equipment, net   167    533 
Goodwill   10,185    23,368 
Customer lists, net   5,786    8,589 
Tradenames, net   1,471    3,178 
Other intangible assets, net   -    256 
Restricted cash   1,000    - 
Cost method investment   340    - 
Other assets   160    256 
Total assets  $35,209   $54,569 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT          
           
Current Liabilities:          
Accounts payable  $9,698   $10,907 
Accrued expenses   12,338    10,721 
Deferred revenue   4,900    3,058 
Income taxes payable   53    53 
Bank debt, current portion   117    121 
Notes payable, related parties   4,110    225 
Contingent consideration   -    515 
Derivative financial instruments   3,159    1,749 
Term loans, current portion, net of debt discount   30,551    30,742 
Total current liabilities   64,926    58,091 
           
Long-term Liabilities:          
Notes payable, related parties, net of current portion   -    3,970 
Deferred income taxes   604    1,002 
Term loans, net of current portion, net of debt discount   2,369    6,233 
Derivative financial instruments   3,365    1,316 
Total long-term liabilities   6,338    12,521 
           
Total Liabilities   71,264    70,612 
           
Commitments and Contingencies          
           
Stockholders’ Deficit:          
Common stock; $0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 122,232,467 and 28,516,804 issued and 121,833,616 and 28,210,003 outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively   10    2 
Common stock warrants, no par   1    1,727 
Treasury stock, at cost - 398,852 and 306,801 shares at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively   (2)   (1)
Additional paid-in capital   138,893    130,869 
Accumulated deficit   (175,162)   (148,983)
Total InterCloud Systems, Inc. stockholders’ deficit   (36,260)   (16,386)
Non-controlling interest   205    343 
Total stockholders’ deficit   (36,055)   (16,043)
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit  $35,209   $54,569 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 1 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

   For the three months ended   For the six months ended 
   June 30,   June 30, 
   2017   2016   2017   2016 
                 
                 
Service revenue  $7,574   $20,860   $21,337   $35,471 
Product revenue   547    1,734    734    4,752 
Total revenue   8,121    22,594    22,071    40,223 
Cost of revenue   6,493    17,375    17,076    30,590 
Gross profit   1,628    5,219    4,995    9,633 
                     
Operating expenses:                    
Depreciation and amortization   264    556    707    1,112 
Salaries and wages   2,329    4,205    5,604    8,311 
Selling, general and administrative   2,157    4,776    5,128    8,070 
Goodwill impairment charge   621    -    3,767    - 
Intangible asset impairment charge   162    -    959    - 
Total operating expenses   5,533    9,537    16,165    17,493 
                     
Loss from operations   (3,905)   (4,318)   (11,170)   (7,860)
                     
Other income (expenses):                    
Change in fair value of derivative instruments   (1,121)   1,910    (3,545)   4,796 
Interest expense   (1,283)   (3,418)   (5,558)   (8,133)
Gain on conversion of debt   -    -    -    348 
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net   117    (6,969)   (1,054)   (7,812)
Loss on investment in equity method investee   -    -    -    (29)
Loss on disposal of subsidiary   (5,921)   -    (5,226)   - 
Other expense (income)   (84)   714    (122)   683 
Total other expense   (8,292)   (7,763)   (15,505)   (10,147)
                     
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes   (12,197)   (12,081)   (26,675)   (18,007)
                     
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes   (119)   56    (358)   116 
                     
Net loss from continuing operations   (12,078)   (12,137)   (26,317)   (18,123)
                     
Gain on discontinued operations, net of tax   -    (1,198)   -    465 
                     
Net loss   (12,078)   (13,335)   (26,317)   (17,658)
                     
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interest   121    (81)   138    (66)
                     
Net loss attributable to InterCloud Systems, Inc. common stockholders  $(11,957)  $(13,416)  $(26,179)  $(17,724)
                     
Loss per share attributable to InterCloud Systems, Inc. common stockholders, basic and diluted:                    
Net loss from continuing operations  $(0.10)  $(0.39)  $(0.28)  $(0.59)
Net income on discontinued operations, net of taxes  $-   $(0.04)  $-   $0.01 
Net loss per share  $(0.10)  $(0.43)  $(0.28)  $(0.58)
                     
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted   120,261,344    31,442,412    95,675,967    30,662,143 

    

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 2 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

   Common Stock   Common Stock Warrants   Treasury Stock   Additional Paid-in   Accumulated   Non-Controlling     
   Shares   $   Shares   $   Shares   $   Capital   Deficit   Interest   Total 
                                         
Ending balance, December 31, 2016   28,210,003   $2    1,085,152   $1,727    306,801   $(1)  $130,869   $(148,983)  $343   $(16,043)
                                                   
Issuance of shares to non-employees for services   125,000    -    -    -    -    -    12    -    -    12 
Issuance of shares to employees and directors for services   1,300,000    -    -    -    -    -    488    -    -    488 
Issuance of shares pursuant to Forward Investments LLC promissory notes   40,490,172    4    -    -    -    -    2,810    -    -    2,814 
Issuance of shares pursuant to Dominion Convertible note   25,710,028    3    -    -    -    -    1,215    -    -    1,218 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to payment Senior secured convertible note, JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd.   21,432,111    2    -    -    -    -    949    -    -    951 
Issuance of shares pursuant to MEF I (Magna) convertible note   500,000    -    -    -    -    -    19    -    -    19 
Issuance of shares pursuant to Smithline convertible note   5,852,726    1    -    -    -    -    245    -    -    246 
Purchase of treasury shares   (81,667)   -    -    -    81,667    -    -    -    -    - 
Cancellation of shares previously issued   (1,694,373)   (1)   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (1)
Reclassification of warrants issued pursuant to JGB Amendment  Agreement   -    -    (225,000)   (972)   -    -    939    -    -    (33)
Reclassification of warrants issued pursuant to 8760 Acquisition   -    -    (187,500)   (36)   -    -    33    -    -    (3)
Reclassification of warrants issued pursuant to bridge agreement (GPB)   -    -    -    (258)   -    -    258    -    -    - 
Reclassification of warrants issued pursuant to settlement of AP (SRFF)   -    -    (625,000)   (460)   -    -    385    -    -    (75)
Cancellation of shares previously issued   (10,384)   (1)   -    -    10,384    (1)   -    -    -    (2)
Stock compensation expense   -    -    -    -    -    -    489    -    -    489 
Loan forgiveness to related party   -    -    -    -    -    -    182    -    -    182 
Net income (loss)   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (26,179)   (138)   (26,317)
                                                 - 
Ending balance, June 30, 2017   121,833,616   $10    47,652   $1    398,852   $(2)  $138,893   $(175,162)  $205   $(36,055)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 3 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

   For the six months ended 
   June 30, 
   2017   2016 
         
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss  $(26,317)  $(17,658)
           
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:          
Gain on discontinued operations   -    (465)
Provision for bad debts   255    100 
Depreciation and amortization   707    1,112 
Amortization of debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs   3,644    3,906 
Stock compensation for services   977    1,309 
Issuance of shares to non-employees for services   12    71 
Change in fair value of derivative instruments   3,545    (4,796)
Deferred income taxes   (398)   (51)
Goodwill impairment charge   3,767    - 
Intangible asset impairment charge   959    - 
Gain on conversion of debt   -    (348)
Loss on extinguishment of debt   1,054    7,812 
Loss on disposal of subsidiary   5,226    - 
Loss on investment in equity method investee        29 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
Accounts receivable   2,511    (1,333)
Inventory   165    816 
Other assets   (2,811)   (1,760)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses   2,405    941 
Deferred revenue   1,933    (1,634)
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations   (2,366)   (11,949)
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations   -    414 
Net cash used in operating activities   (2,366)   (11,535)
           
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Purchases of equipment   (29)   (107)
Restricted cash   -    (12,190)
Issuance of notes receivable   63    (1,644)
Cash proceeds from sale of Highwire   4,000    - 
Cash proceeds from sale of SDNE   422    - 
Restricted cash proceeds from sale of SDNE   1,000    - 
Net cash paid upon disposal of the AWS Entities   (105)   - 
Net cash paid upon the disposal of Nottingham   (8)   - 
Consideration paid for acquisitions, net of cash received   -    95 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations   5,343    (13,846)
Net cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations   -    21,887 
Net cash provided by investing activities   5,343    8,041 
           
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from bank borrowings   15    - 
Repayments of bank borrowings   (4)   (6)
Proceeds from term loans   70    - 
Debt issuance costs on new term loans   (50)   - 
Term loan-related repayments from proceeds of sale of subsidiary   (3,625)   - 
Repayment of term loans   (285)   (2,011)
Repayments of receivables purchase agreements   (480)   - 
Cancellations of shares issued for interest   (1)   - 
Repurchase of common stock   -    (1)
Net cash used in financing activities   (4,360)   (2,018)
           
Net decrease in cash   (1,383)   (5,512)
           
Cash, beginning of period   1,790    7,944 
           
Cash, end of period  $407   $2,432 
           
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:          
Cash paid for interest  $152   $2,572 
Cash paid for income taxes  $39   $83 
           
Non-cash investing and financing activities:          
Issuance of shares pursuant to conversion of debt  $5,247   $2,207 
Issuance of warrants pursuant to acquisition   $-   $1,000 
Addition to debt discount  $1,826   $1,581 
Issuance of shares in lieu of cash compensation  $-   $206 
Issuance of shares pursuant to loan covenants  $-   $828 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 4 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Overview

 

InterCloud Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on November 22, 1999 under the laws of the state of Delaware and is a provider of networking orchestration and automation for the Internet of things (IOT), software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) environments to the telecommunications service provider (carrier) and corporate enterprise markets. The Company’s managed services solutions offer enterprise and service-provider customers the opportunity to adopt an operational expense model by outsourcing cloud deployment and management to the Company rather than the capital expense model that has dominated in recent decades in IT infrastructure management. The Company’s professional services group offers a broad range of solutions to enterprise and service provider customers, including application development teams, analytics, project management, program management, unified communications, network management and field support services on a short and long-term basis. The Company’s applications and infrastructure division offers enterprise and service provider customers specialty contracting services, including engineering, design, installation and maintenance services, that support the build-out and operation of some of the most advanced small cell, Wi-Fi and distributed antenna system (DAS) networks.

 

Principles of Consolidation and Accounting for Investments in Affiliate Companies

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, which include Tropical Communications, Inc. (“Tropical”) (since August 2011 – sold in April 2017 in connection with the sale of the AWS Entities), Rives-Monteiro Leasing, LLC (“RM Leasing”) (since December 2011), ADEX Corporation, ADEX Puerto Rico, LLC and Highwire (collectively, “ADEX” or “ADEX Entities”) (since September 2012 – Highwire was sold in January 2017 – refer to Note 3, Disposals of Subsidiaries, for further detail), TNS, Inc. (“TNS”) (since September 2012), AW Solutions, Inc. and AW Solutions Puerto Rico, LLC (collectively, the “AWS Entities”) (since April 2013 – the AWS Entities were sold in April 2017 – refer to Note 3, Disposals of Subsidiaries, for further detail), Integration Partners – NY Corporation (“IPC”) (since January 2014), RentVM Inc. (“RentVM”) (since February 2014), and SDN Essentials, LLC (“SDNE”) (since January 2016 – SDNE was sold in May 2017 – refer to Note 3, Disposals of Subsidiaries, for further detail). The results of operations of the Company’s former subsidiaries, VaultLogix, LLC (“VaultLogix”) (since October 2014), and PCS Holdings LLC (“Axim”) (since December 2014), have been included as discontinued operations on the accompanying financial statements. In February 2016, the Company consummated the sale of certain assets of VaultLogix, and in April 2016, the Company consummated the sale of all assets of Axim (refer to Note 15, Discontinued Operations for further information). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

The Company consolidates all entities in which it has a controlling voting interest and all variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary.

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rives-Montiero Engineering, LLC (“RM Engineering”) (since December 2011), in which the Company owns an interest of 49%. The Company has the ability to exercise its call option to acquire the remaining 51% of RM Engineering for a nominal amount and thus makes all significant decisions related to RM Engineering even though it absorbs only 49% of the losses. Additionally, substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of the entity by the 51% holder of RM Engineering.

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 include the accounts of Nottingham Enterprises LLC (“Nottingham”), in which the Company owned an interest of 40% (the Company returned its interest in Nottingham effective April 1, 2017). Management determined that Nottingham was a VIE because it met the following criteria: (i) the entity had insufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties and the 60% owner guaranteed its debt, (ii) the voting rights of the Company were not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the legal entity, and (iii) substantially all of the legal entity’s activities either involved or were conducted on behalf of an investor that had disproportionately few voting rights. The Company had the ability to exercise its call option to acquire the remaining 60% of Nottingham for a nominal amount and made all significant decisions related to Nottingham. In connection with the Company returning its interest in Nottingham, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of subsidiary of $455 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. 

 

 5 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 included the Company’s 13.7% ownership interest in NGNWare, LLC (“NGNWare”). The Company wrote off its investment in NGNWare as of December 31, 2016. The Company did not hold a controlling financial interest in NGNWare but had the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of NGNWare. As such, the Company accounted for the investment in NGNWare under the equity method of accounting.

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of such statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Additionally, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 13, 2017.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on a comparative basis. During the year ending December 31, 2016, the Company disposed of two subsidiaries. The results of these subsidiaries are included within discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

 

During July 2017, the Company determined that Forward Investments, LLC was no longer a related party. The outstanding debt to Forward Investments, LLC was reclassed from notes payable, related parties to term loans effective January 1, 2016. Amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2016 were retrospectively updated to match the presentation on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017. Interest expense was retrospectively updated for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 to match the presentation on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

During July 2017, the Company determined that Frank Jadevaia, the former owner of IPC and former President of the Company, was no longer a related party due to his resignation from his role as the Company’s President on November 4, 2016. The outstanding debt to Frank Jadevaia was reclassed from notes payable, related parties to term loans, effective November 4, 2016. Amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2016 were retrospectively updated to match the presentation on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017. Interest expense related to this debt was unchanged for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

 

Reverse Stock Split

 

On July 7, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of its Certificate of Incorporation that effected a one-for-four reverse split of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, effective as of the open of trading on July 12, 2017. The Company’s stockholders, at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, had previously authorized the Company’s Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split within a range of ratios, including one-for-four, at any time within one year following such Annual Meeting, as determined by the board.

 

All common share, warrant, stock option, and per share information in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements gives retroactive effect to the one-for-four reverse stock split that was effected on July 12, 2017. There was no change to the number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company as a result of the reverse stock split. The par value of the Company’s common stock was unchanged at $0.0001 per share post-split. The Company will continue to trade under the ticker symbol “ICLD” on the OTCQB Venture Market, although the letter “D” was temporarily appended to the ticker symbol for twenty days following the reverse split.

 

Business Combinations

 

The Company accounts for its business combinations under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805-10, Business Combinations (“ASC 805-10”), which requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including non-controlling interests, are recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. ASC 805-10 also specifies criteria that intangible assets acquired in a business combination must meet to be recognized and reported apart from goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of the tangible net assets and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from the business combinations and are expensed as incurred. If the business combination provides for contingent consideration, the Company records the contingent consideration at fair value at the acquisition date and any changes in fair value after the acquisition date are accounted for as measurement-period adjustments if they pertain to additional information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date and that the Company obtained during the measurement period. Changes in fair value of contingent consideration resulting from events after the acquisition date, such as earn-outs, are recognized as follows: 1) if the contingent consideration is classified as equity, the contingent consideration is not re-measured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity, or 2) if the contingent consideration is classified as a liability, the changes in fair value are recognized in earnings.

 

 6 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

Segment Information

 

The Company operates in three operating segments – as an applications and infrastructure provider, as a professional services provider, and as a managed services provider. The applications and infrastructure segment provides engineering and professional consulting services and voice, data and optical solutions. The engineering, design, installation and maintenance services of the applications and infrastructure segment support the build-out and operation of enterprise, fiber optic, Ethernet and wireless networks. The professional services segment provides outsourced services to the wireless and wireline industry and information technology industry. The managed services segment provides hardware and software products to customers and provides maintenance and support for those products.

 

The Company’s reporting units have been aggregated into one of three operating segments due to their similar economic characteristics, products, or production and distribution methods. The first operating segment is applications and infrastructure, which is comprised of the components TNS, the AWS Entities (sold by the Company in April 2017), Tropical (sold by the Company in April 2017 in connection with the sale of the AWS Entities), RM Leasing, and RM Engineering. The Company’s second operating segment is professional services, which consists of the ADEX Entities and SDNE (sold by the Company in May 2017). The Company’s third operating segment is managed services, which consists of the IPC and RentVM components. The operating segments mentioned above constitute reporting segments.

 

During 2016, the Company consummated the sale of certain assets of its former VaultLogix and Axim subsidiaries. These subsidiaries comprised the Company’s former cloud services segment. The cloud services segment provided cloud computing and storage services to customers.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company’s revenues are generated from its three reportable segments: applications and infrastructure, professional services, and managed services. The Company recognizes revenue on arrangements in accordance with ASC Topic 605-10, “Revenue Recognition”. The Company recognizes revenue only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed, and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

 

The applications and infrastructure segment revenues are derived from contracts to provide technical engineering services along with contracting services to commercial and governmental customers. The contracts of TNS, Tropical (sold by the Company in April 2017 in connection with the sale of the AWS Entities) and RM Engineering provide that payment for the Company’s services may be based on either direct labor hours at fixed hourly rates or fixed-price contracts. The services provided under the contracts are generally provided within one month. Occasionally, the services may be provided over a period of up to six months.

 

 7 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The AWS Entities, which the Company sold in April 2017, generally recognized revenue using the percentage of completion method. Revenues and fees under the contracts of these entities were recognized utilizing the units-of-delivery method, which used measures such as task completion within an overall contract. The units-of-delivery approach is an output method used in situations where it is more representative of progress on a contract than an input method, such as the efforts-expended approach. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts, if any, were made in the period in which such losses were determined. Changes in job performance conditions and final contract settlements could have resulted in revisions to costs and income, which were recognized in the period in which revisions were determined.

 

The AWS Entities also generated revenue from service contracts with certain customers. These contracts were accounted for under the proportional performance method. Under this method, revenue was recognized in proportion to the value provided to the customer for each project as of each reporting date.

 

The revenues of the Company’s professional services segment, which is comprised of the ADEX Entities and SDNE (sold by the Company in May 2017), are derived from contracted services to provide technical engineering and management solutions to large voice and data communications providers, as specified by their clients. The contracts provide that payments made for the Company’s services may be based on either direct labor hours at fixed hourly rates or fixed-price contracts. The services provided under these contracts are generally provided within one month. Occasionally, the services may be provided over a period of up to four months. If it is anticipated that the services will span a period exceeding one month, depending on the contract terms, the Company will provide either progress billing at least once a month or upon completion of the clients’ specifications.

 

ADEX’s former Highwire division, which the Company sold in January 2017, generated revenue through its telecommunications engineering group, which contracted with telecommunications infrastructure manufacturers to install the manufacturer’s products for end users. The Highwire division recognized revenue using the proportional performance method. Management judgments and estimates were made and used in connection with revenue recognized using the proportional performance method. If management made different judgments and estimates, then the amount and timing of revenue for any period could differ materially from the reported revenue.

 

The Company’s TNS and IPC subsidiaries, as well as ADEX’s former Highwire division, sometimes require customers to provide a deposit prior to beginning work on a project. When this occurs, the deposit is recorded as deferred revenue and is recognized in revenue when the work is complete.

  

The Company’s IPC subsidiary, which is included in the Company’s managed services segment, is a value-added reseller that generates revenues from the resale of voice, video and data networking hardware and software contracted services for design, implementation and maintenance services for voice, video, and data networking infrastructure. IPC’s customers are higher education organizations, governmental agencies and commercial customers. IPC also provides maintenance and support and professional services. For certain maintenance contracts, IPC assumes responsibility for fulfilling the support to customers and recognizes the associated revenue either on a ratable basis over the life of the contract or, if a customer purchases a time and materials maintenance program, as maintenance is provided to the customer.  Revenue for the sale of third-party maintenance contracts is recognized net of the related cost of revenue.  In a maintenance contract, all services are provided by the Company’s third-party providers. As a result, the Company concluded that IPC is acting as an agent and IPC recognizes revenue on a net basis at the date of sale with revenue being equal to the gross margin on the transaction.  As IPC is under no obligation to perform additional services, revenue is recognized at the time of sale rather than over the life of the maintenance agreement.

 

IPC also generates revenue through the sale of a subscription-based cloud services to its customers. Revenue related to these customers is recognized over the life of the contract. This revenue is reported in the managed services segment.

 

 8 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

For multiple-element arrangements, IPC recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 605-25, Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. The Company allocates revenue for such arrangements based on the relative selling prices of the elements applying the following hierarchy: first vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), then third-party evidence (“TPE”) of selling price if VSOE is not available, and finally the Company’s estimate of the selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. VSOE exists when the Company sells the deliverables separately and represents the actual price charged by the Company for each deliverable. Estimated selling price reflects the Company’s best estimate of what the selling prices of each deliverable would be if it were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis taking into consideration the cost structure of the Company’s business, technical skill required, customer location and other market conditions. Each element that has stand-alone value is accounted for as a separate unit of accounting. Revenue allocated to each unit of accounting is recognized when the service is provided or the product is delivered. 

 

Inventory

 

The inventory balance at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was related to the Company’s IPC subsidiary. IPC purchases inventory for resale to customers and records it at the lower of cost or market until sold. As inventory relates to specific customer orders, the Company determines the cost of the inventory using the specific identification method. If an item can no longer be matched to a specific customer order, the Company reserves the item at 100%. Inventory consisted of networking equipment for which title had not passed to customers as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Inventory reserves were $263 and $84 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill was generated through the business acquisitions made by the Company. As the total consideration paid exceeded the value of the net assets acquired, the Company recorded goodwill for each of the completed acquisitions. At the date of acquisition, the Company performed a valuation to determine the value of the intangible assets, along with the allocation of assets and liabilities acquired. The goodwill is attributable to synergies and economies of scale provided to the Company by the acquired entity.

 

The Company tests its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually (as of October 1) and whenever events or circumstances change that indicate impairment may have occurred. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include, among others: a significant decline in the Company’s expected future cash flows; a sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization; a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate of the Company’s segments; unanticipated competition; and slower growth rates. Any adverse change in these factors could have a significant impact on the recoverability of goodwill, the indefinite-lived intangible assets and the Company’s consolidated financial results.

 

During 2016, indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets were identified by management in the managed services segment. The Company’s management then determined that the IPC reporting unit assets were impaired and recognized an impairment loss as of December 31, 2016 related to intangible assets as the carrying value of the IPC reporting unit was in excess of its fair value. If IPC’s projected long-term sales growth rate, profit margins or terminal rate continue to change, or the assumed weighted-average cost of capital is considerably higher, future testing may indicate additional impairment in this reporting unit and, as a result, the remaining assets may also be impaired.

 

During the first three months of 2017, indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets were identified by management in the professional services segment as a result of the sale of ADEX’s Highwire division. Per ASC 350-20-40-7, when a portion of goodwill is allocated to a business to be disposed of, the goodwill remaining in the portion of the reporting unit to be retained shall be tested for impairment in accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-3A through 35-19 using its adjusted carrying amount.

 

Based on the Company’s analysis, the Company recorded goodwill impairment for ADEX and SDNE of $2,885 and $261, respectively, and intangible asset impairment for ADEX and SDNE of $637 and $160, respectively, in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets were identified by management in the professional services segment as a result of the sale of SDNE. Per ASC 350-20-40-7, when a portion of goodwill is allocated to a business to be disposed of, the goodwill remaining in the portion of the reporting unit to be retained shall be tested for impairment in accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-3A through 35-19 using its adjusted carrying amount.

 

Based on the Company’s analysis, the reporting units in the Company’s professional services segment were not impaired as a result of the sale of SDNE.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets were identified by management in the professional services segment as a result of the sale of the AWS Entities. Per ASC 350-20-40-7, when a portion of goodwill is allocated to a business to be disposed of, the goodwill remaining in the portion of the reporting unit to be retained shall be tested for impairment in accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-3A through 35-19 using its adjusted carrying amount.

 

Based on the Company’s analysis, the Company recorded goodwill impairment for TNS and RME of $596 and $25, respectively, and intangible asset impairment for TNS and RME of $123 and $39, respectively, in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

 9 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

Commitments and Contingencies 

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various contingencies. The Company records a contingency in the consolidated financial statements when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable, or otherwise disclosed, in accordance with ASC Topic 450, Contingencies (“ASC Topic 450”). Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In the event the Company determines that a loss is not probable, but is reasonably possible, and it becomes possible to develop what the Company believes to be a reasonable range of possible loss, then the Company will include disclosures related to such matter as appropriate and in compliance with ASC Topic 450. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility that the losses could exceed the amounts already accrued, the Company will, when applicable, adjust the accrual in the period in which the determination is made, disclose an estimate of the additional loss or range of loss, indicate that the estimate is immaterial with respect to its financial statements as a whole or, if the amount of such adjustment cannot be reasonably estimated, disclose that an estimate cannot be made.

 

Breach of Contract Actions 

 

In July 2013, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida titled The Farkas Group, Inc., The Atlas Group of Companies, LLC and Michael D. Farkas v. InterCloud Systems, Inc. (Case No. 502013CA01133XXXMB) for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. In the complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the Company breached contractual agreements between it and plaintiffs pertaining to certain indebtedness amounting to approximately $116 allegedly owed by the Company to the plaintiffs and the Company’s agreement to convert such indebtedness into shares of its common stock. The plaintiff alleges that they are entitled to receive in the aggregate 0.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock or aggregate damages reflecting the trading value at the high price for the common stock. The Company has asserted as a defense that such indebtedness, together with any right to convert such indebtedness into shares of common stock, was cancelled pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 2, 2009 between the Company and the plaintiffs. The Farkas Group was a control person of the Company during the period that it was a public “shell” company and facilitated the transfer of control of the Company to its former chief executive officer, Gideon Taylor. This matter is presently set on the court’s non-jury trial docket. The Company intends to continue to vigorously defend this lawsuit.  

 

On May 15, 2017, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York titled Grant Thornton LLP v. InterCloud Systems, Inc., Case No. 652619/2017, for breach of contract, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. In the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the Company breached an agreement with the plaintiff by failing to pay the fees of the plaintiff of approximately $769,000 and to reimburse the plaintiff for its related expenses for a proposed audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company intends to vigorously defend this action, and has commenced a separate action against Grant Thornton LLP in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York titled InterCloud Systems, Inc. v. Grant Thornton LLP, Case No. 65424/2017 for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement relating to the engagement letter between the Company and Grant Thornton LLP and to recover the fees the Company paid to Grant Thornton LLP, as well as other damages.

Purported Class Action Suit 

 

In March 2014, a complaint entitled In re InterCloud Systems Sec. Litigation, Case No. 3:14-cv-01982 (D.N.J.) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company, its Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Mark Munro, The DreamTeamGroup and MissionIR, as purported securities advertisers and investor relations firms, and John Mylant, a purported investor and investment advisor. The complaint was purportedly filed on behalf of a class of certain persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between November 5, 2013 and March 17, 2014. The complaint alleged violations by the defendants (other than Mark Munro) of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and other related provisions in connection with certain alleged courses of conduct that were intended to deceive the plaintiff and the investing public and to cause the members of the purported class to purchase shares of our common stock at artificially inflated prices based on untrue statements of a material fact or omissions to state material facts necessary to make the statements not misleading. The complaint also alleged that Mr. Munro and the Company violated Section 20 of the Exchange Act as controlling persons of the other defendants. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, attorney and expert fees, and other unspecified litigation costs. 

 

On November 3, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey issued an order appointing Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as lead plaintiffs’ counsel and Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP as liaison counsel for the pending actions. The lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint in January 2015 adding additional third-party defendants. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in late January 2015 and the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint in early March 2015. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on March 13, 2015. The Company’s motion to dismiss was denied by the Court on October 29, 2015. The Court held a status conference on February 29, 2016, and entered a PreTrial Scheduling Order on February 29, 2016.

 

In April 2017, the parties in this proceeding and the related derivative actions described below reached a global settlement in principle for an aggregate of $3.0 million, which amount will be paid by the Company’s insurers. The Company and the other parties in such proceedings are currently in the process of finalizing the global settlement and obtaining court approval of the settlement. While the Company believes a global settlement can be reached by the parties and approved by the applicable courts, there can be no assurance that any such settlement will be reached and approved. 

 

 10 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

Derivative Actions 

 

In January 2016, a derivative complaint entitled Michael E. Sloan, derivatively and on behalf of InterCloud Systems, Inc. v. Mark Munro, Mark F. Durfee, Charles K. Miller, Neal Oristano, Daniel J. Sullivan, Roger M. Ponder, Lawrence M. Sands, Frank Jadevaia, and Scott Davis, Defendants, and InterCloud Systems, Inc., Nominal Defendant, Case No. 11878 (DE Chancery) was filed in the Delaware Chancery Court. This action arises out of the same conduct at issue in the purported class action lawsuit. In the complaint, nominal plaintiff alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duty as directors and officers, abused control, grossly mismanaged, and unjustly enriched themselves by having knowingly hired a stock promotion firm that caused analyst reports to be disseminated that falsely stated they were not paid for by such stock promotion firm and the Company, and were written on behalf of the Company for the purpose of promoting the Company and driving up its stock price. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, amendments to the Company’s articles of incorporation and by-laws, disgorgement from the individual defendants and costs and disbursements in the action. The defendants agreed to accept service on March 21, 2016 and counsel are negotiating a schedule to answer, move to dismiss or otherwise respond to the complaint.

 

In June 2016, a derivative complaint entitled Wasseem Hamdan, derivatively and on behalf of InterCloud Systems, Inc. v. Mark Munro, Mark F. Durfee, Charles K. Miller, Neal Oristano, and Roger M. Ponder, Defendants, and InterCloud Systems, Inc., Nominal Defendant, Case No.: 3:16-cv-03706 (D.N.J.) was filed in the New Jersey Federal District Court. This action arises out of the same conduct at issue in the purported class action lawsuit. In the complaint, nominal plaintiff alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duty as directors and officers, grossly mismanaged, and unjustly enriched themselves during the relevant period by having knowingly hired a stock promotion firm that caused analyst reports to be disseminated that falsely stated they were not paid for by such stock promotion firm and the Company, and were written on behalf of the Company for the purpose of promoting the Company and driving up its stock price. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, amendments to the Company’s articles of incorporation and by-laws, disgorgement from the individual defendants and costs and disbursements in the action. On February 10, 2017, plaintiffs filed a motion to consolidate this action with the derivative action described below. The court has not yet ruled on the consolidation motion, which is uncontested.

 

In July 2016, a derivative complaint entitled John Scrutchens, derivatively and on behalf of InterCloud Systems, Inc. v. Mark E. Munro, Mark F. Durfee, Charles K. Miller, Neal Oristano, and Roger Ponder, Defendants, and InterCloud Systems, Inc., Nominal Defendant, Case No.: 3:16-CV-04207-FLW-DEA (D.N.J.) was filed in the United States Federal District Court for the District of New Jersey. This action arises out of the same conduct at issue in the purported class action lawsuit filed against the Company. In the complaint, nominal plaintiff alleges that the individual defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder because in exercising reasonable care as directors of the Company, the defendants knew or should have known that statements contained in the Company’s proxy statements for its annual stockholders’ meetings held in 2013 and 2014 were false and misleading in that such proxy statements (i) omitted material information regarding, among other wrongdoings, the purported wrongdoings of the defendants that generally are at issue in the purported class action lawsuit filed against the Company and the other derivative actions filed against the defendants, and (ii) included by reference materially false and misleading financial statements. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, amendments to the Company’s corporate governance and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws and to protect the Company and its stockholders from a repeat of the purported wrongdoings of the defendants, punitive damages from the individual defendants, disgorgement from the individual defendants and costs and disbursements in the action. As discussed above, on February 10, 2017, plaintiffs in the derivative action described above filed a motion to consolidate that action with this derivative action. The court has not yet ruled on the consolidation motion, which is uncontested.

 

In April 2017, the parties in all of the these proceedings and in the purported class action suit described above reached a global settlement in principle for an aggregate of $3.0 million, which amount will be paid by the Company’s insurers. The Company and the other parties in such proceedings are currently in the process of finalizing the global settlement and obtaining preliminary court approval of the settlement. While the Company believes a global settlement can be reached by the parties and approved by the applicable courts, there can be no assurance that any such settlement will be reached and approved.

 

If such proposed global settlement is not reached by the parties and approved by the courts, the Company intends to dispute these claims and to defend these litigations vigorously. However, due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the ultimate outcome of each of these litigations is uncertain. An unfavorable outcome in any such litigation could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Subpoenas

 

On May 21, 2014, the Company received a subpoena from the SEC that stated that the staff of the SEC is conducting an investigation In the Matter of Galena Biopharma, Inc. File No. HO 12356 (now known as “In the Matter of Certain Stock Promotions”) and that the subpoena was issued to the Company as part of an investigation as to whether certain investor relations firms and their clients engaged in market manipulation. The subpoena and accompanying letter did not indicate whether the Company is, or is not, under investigation. Since May 2014, the Company provided testimony to the SEC and produced documents in response to that subpoena and several additional subpoenas received from the SEC in connection with that matter, including a subpoena issued on March 1, 2016 requesting information relating to a transaction involving the Company’s Series H preferred shares in December 2013.

 

 11 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

In connection with the SEC investigation, in May 2015, the Company received information from the SEC that it is continuing an investigation of the Company and certain of its current and former officers, consultants of the Company and others, of “possible violation[s]” of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 9(a) and 10(b) of the Exchange Act and the rules of the SEC thereunder in the offer or sale of securities and certain other matters with respect to which the SEC claims it has information, including the possible market manipulation of the Company’s securities dating back to January 2013. Based upon the Company’s internal investigations, the Company does not believe either it or any of its current or former officers or directors engaged in any activities that violated applicable securities laws. The Company intends to continue to work with the staff of the SEC towards a resolution and to supplement its disclosure regarding the SEC’s investigation accordingly.

 

From time to time, the Company may become a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of its business. Although the results of such litigation and claims in the ordinary course of business cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial condition. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

 

As of June 30, 2017, no accruals for loss contingencies have been recorded. With the exception of the proposed global settlement which would be paid by the Company’s insurers as discussed above, the outcomes of these cases are neither probable nor reasonably estimable.

 

The Company had obligations contingent on the performance of its former SDNE subsidiary, which the Company sold during the three months ended June 30, 2017. These contingent obligations, which were payable to the former owner of SDNE, was based on metrics that contained escalation clauses. The Company believed that the amounts that were recorded within the liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheets were indicative of fair value and were also considered the most likely payout of these obligations. As a result of the sale of SDNE, the Company no longer had any contingent consideration included on its consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”). Under the fair value recognition provisions of this topic, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, based on the terms of the awards.

 

Net Loss Per Share

 

The Company follows ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement for all entities with complex capital structures, and requires a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation.

 

In the accompanying financial statements, basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

  

Potential common shares includable in the computation of fully-diluted per share results are not presented for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

 

Diluted Earnings per Share (“Diluted EPS”) gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of Diluted EPS does not assume conversion, exercise or contingent exercise of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect on losses. As a result, if there is a loss from continuing operations, Diluted EPS is computed in the same manner as Basic EPS. As of June 30, 2017, the Company’s common stock equivalents included 40,011,804 shares that could be converted based on outstanding debt, 8,270,928 shares related to outstanding warrants, and 43,750 shares related to outstanding options that were not included in the calculation of earnings per share for the period then ended. As of June 30, 2016, the Company’s common stock equivalents included 10,190,597 shares that could be converted based on outstanding debt, 270,928 shares related to outstanding warrants, and 43,750 shares related to outstanding options that were not included in the calculation of earnings per share for the period then ended. Such financial instruments may become dilutive and would then need to be included in future calculations of Diluted EPS. Potential common shares includable in the computation of fully-diluted per share results are not presented for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”) provides a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 

 

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).

 

 12 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820 are described as follows:

 

  Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.
     
  Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
     
  Level 3 — Inputs that are unobservable for the asset or liability.

 

The following section describes the valuation methodologies that the Company used to measure different financial instruments at fair value.

 

Debt

 

The fair value of the Company’s debt, which approximated the carrying value of the Company’s debt as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, was estimated at $31,656 and $43,729, respectively. Factors that the Company considered when estimating the fair value of its debt included market conditions, liquidity levels in the private placement market, variability in pricing from multiple lenders and term of the debt. The level of the debt would be considered as Level 2.

 

Contingent Consideration

 

The fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration payable was based on the Company’s evaluation as to the probability and amount of any earn-out that could have ultimately been payable. The Company utilizes a third-party valuation firm to assist in the calculation of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date. The Company evaluates the forecast of the acquired entity and the probability of earn-out provisions being achieved when it evaluates the contingent consideration recorded at initial acquisition date and at each subsequent reporting period. The fair value of contingent consideration is measured at each reporting period and adjusted as necessary. The Company evaluates the terms in contingent consideration arrangements provided to former owners of acquired companies who become employees of the Company to determine if such amounts are part of the purchase price of the acquired entity or compensation. As a result of the sale of SDNE during the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company no longer had any contingent consideration included on its unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017.

 

Additional Disclosures Regarding Fair Value Measurements

 

The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, inventory, other assets, and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturity of those items. 

 

Fair Value of Derivatives

 

The Company utilized a binomial lattice pricing model to determine the fair value of the derivative liability related to the warrants and the put and effective price of future equity offerings of equity-linked financial instruments.

 

Derivative Warrant Liabilities and Convertible Features 

 

The fair value of the derivative liabilities is classified as Level 3 within the Company’s fair value hierarchy. Please refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further discussion of the measurement of fair value of the derivatives and their underlying assumptions.

 13 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:

  

   Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date Using
 
   Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
   June 30, 2017 
Liabilities:            
Current derivative features related to convertible debentures  $             -   $                    -   $2,964 
Current derivative features related to warrants   -    -    195 
Long-term derivative features related to convertible debentures   -    -    1,966 
Long-term derivative features related to warrants   -    -    1,399 
                
Total liabilities at fair value  $-   $-   $6,524 
                
    December 31, 2016
Liabilities:               
Current derivative features related to convertible debentures  $-   $     -   $1,749 
Contingent consideration   -    -    515 
Long-term derivative features related to convertible debentures   -    -    1,316 
                
Total liabilities at fair value  $-   $-   $3,580 

   

The changes in Level 3 financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were as follows:

  

   Amount 
Balance as of December 31, 2016  $3,580 
Change in fair value of derivative features related to convertible debentures   (107)
Change in fair value of warrant derivative   290 
Reclassification of equity warrants to derivative   110 
Fair value of JGB warrant derivative   65 
Adjustment of derivative liability upon extinguishment of debt   2,241 
Adjustment of make-whole provision upon payment   (815)
Fair value of derivative features related to MEF I, L.P.   250 
Fair value of derivative features related to Dominion term loan   38 
Balance as of March 31, 2017  $5,652 
      
Change in fair value of derivative features related to convertible debentures   371 
Change in fair value of warrant derivative   979 
Fair Value of derivative features related to RDW term loan   39 
Cancellation of 8760 warrants   (2)
Settlement of contingent consideration   (515)
Balance as of June 30, 2017  $6,524 

 

Treasury Stock

 

The Company records treasury stock at the cost to acquire it and includes treasury stock as a component of stockholders’ deficit.

 

Cost Method Investment

 

In connection with the sale of the AWS Entities (refer to Note 3, Disposals of Subsidiaries, for further detail), the Company retained a 19.9% interest in the disposed of subsidiary. In accordance with ASC 325-20, the Company accounted for this investment under the cost method, as the Company’s interest is less than 20% and the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the disposed of subsidiary. The fair value of the investment is measured at every reporting period, and the balance is adjusted accordingly with any changes reflected on the consolidated statement of operations.

 14 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The investment was initially valued on April 25, 2017, the date of the sale of the AWS Entities. Based on a sales price of $2,000,000, and a remaining interest of 19.9%, the Company initially recorded the investment at $500,000. On June 30, 2017, the Company utilized a third-party valuation firm to determine the fair value of the investment. Based on the discounted cash flow method, the fair value as of June 30, 2017 was $340,000. The change in the fair value of the investment was recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

2. GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTY, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND MANAGEMENT’S PLANS

 

The Company’s management believes that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s management believes that its available cash balance as of the date of this filing will not be sufficient to fund its anticipated level of operations for at least the next 12 months. The Company’s ability to continue operations depends on its ability to sustain and grow revenue and results of operations as well as its ability to access capital markets when necessary to accomplish the Company’s strategic objectives. The Company’s management believes that the Company will continue to incur losses for the immediate future. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company generated gross profits but was unable to achieve positive cash flow from operations. The Company’s management expects to meet its future cash needs from the results of operations and, depending on the results of operations, the Company will likely need additional equity or debt financing until the Company can achieve profitability and positive cash flows from operating activities, if ever. 

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company suffered recurring losses from operations. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit of $36,055 and $16,043, respectively. At June 30, 2017, the Company had a working capital deficit of approximately $48,826, as compared to a working capital deficit of approximately $39,702 at December 31, 2016. The decrease of $9,124 in the Company’s working capital from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017 was primarily the result of a decrease in accounts receivable of $5,493, a $1,383 decrease in cash, a $1,842 increase in deferred revenue, a $1,410 increase in current derivative financial instruments based on changes in fair value, and a combined $3,694 increase in the current portions of notes payable to related parties and term loans. The decrease was offset by a $1,937 increase in loans receivable and a $2,815 increase in other current assets.

 

Within the next 12 months, the Company has obligations relating to the payment of indebtedness on term loans of $32,083. The Company anticipates meeting its cash obligations on indebtedness that is payable on or prior to August 31, 2018 from earnings from operations, the sale of certain operating assets or businesses or from the proceeds of additional indebtedness or equity raises. If the Company is not successful in obtaining additional financing when required, the Company expects that it will be able to renegotiate and extend certain of its notes payable as required to enable it to meet its remaining debt obligations as they become due, although there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to do so.

 

The Company’s future capital requirements for its operations will depend on many factors, including the profitability of its businesses, the number and cash requirements of other acquisition candidates that the Company pursues, and the costs of operations. The Company’s management has taken several actions to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations, including the reduction of certain general and administrative expenses, consulting expenses and other professional services fees. Additionally, if the Company’s actual revenues are less than forecasted, the Company anticipates implementing headcount reductions to a level that more appropriately matches then-current revenue and expense levels. The Company is evaluating other measures to further improve its liquidity, including the sale of certain operating assets or businesses, the sale of equity or debt securities and entering into joint ventures with third parties. Lastly, in July 2017, the Company elected to reduce related-party debt by converting such debt into shares of the Company's Series J preferred stock (refer to Note 16, Subsequent Events, for further detail). The Company may elect to reduce certain third-party debt in the future by converting such debt into shares of the Company's common stock. The Company’s management believes that these actions will enable the Company to meet its liquidity requirements through the next 12 months. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in any capital-raising efforts that it may undertake to fund operations over the next 12 months.

   

The Company plans to generate positive cash flow from its operating subsidiaries. However, to execute the Company’s business plan, service existing indebtedness and implement its business strategy, the Company anticipates that it will need to obtain additional financing from time to time and may choose to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings, a bank line of credit, borrowings from affiliates or other arrangements. The Company cannot be sure that any additional funding, if needed, will be available on terms favorable to the Company or at all. Furthermore, any additional capital raised through the sale of equity or equity-linked securities may dilute the Company’s current stockholders’ ownership and could also result in a decrease in the market price of the Company’s common stock. The terms of any securities issued by the Company in future capital transactions may be more favorable to new investors and may include the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities, which may have a further dilutive effect. The Company also may be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities it issues, such as convertible notes and warrants, which may adversely impact the Company’s financial condition. Furthermore, any debt financing, if available, may subject the Company to restrictive covenants and significant interest costs. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional capital, when needed, to continue operations in their current form. 

 

3. DISPOSALS OF SUBSIDIARIES

 

On January 31, 2017, the Company sold the Highwire division of ADEX. This division accounted for approximately $0 and $2,966 in revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $365 and $4,571 in revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Under the terms of the sale, the Company received $4,000 in total proceeds and is expected to receive an additional working capital adjustment of approximately $500 to be paid in August 2017. The Company used proceeds from the sale to make payments on term loans (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). In connection with the sale, the Company completed an ASC 350-20 goodwill fair value assignment, which allocated $3,003 from the reporting unit to Highwire. 

 15 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

  

Per ASC 350-20-40-7, when a portion of goodwill is allocated to a business to be disposed of, the goodwill remaining in the portion of the reporting unit to be retained shall be tested for impairment in accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-3A through 35-19 using its adjusted carrying amount. As a result of the sale, the Company identified indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. 

 

Based on the Company’s analysis, the Company recorded goodwill impairment for ADEX and SDNE of $2,885 and $261, respectively, and intangible asset impairment for ADEX and SDNE of $637 and $160, respectively, in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017. 

 

As a result of the disposal of the Highwire division of ADEX, the Company recorded a gain on disposal of subsidiaries of $695 to the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017. 

 

On April 25, 2017, the Company sold 80.1% of the assets associated with its AWS Entities subsidiaries. The AWS Entities accounted for approximately $0 and $2,865 in revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $2,738 and $6,772 in revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The purchase price paid by buyer for the assets included the assumption of certain liabilities and contracts associated with the AWS Entities, the issuance to the Company of a one-year convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $2,000 (refer to Note 4, Loans Receivable, for further detail), and a potential earn-out after six months in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) three times EBITDA of the AWS Entities for the six-month period immediately following the closing and (ii) $1,500. In addition, the asset purchase agreement contains a working capital adjustment.

 

Based on the Company’s analysis in accordance with ASC 350-20-40-7, the Company recorded goodwill impairment for TNS and RME of $596 and $25, respectively, and intangible asset impairment for TNS and RME of $123 and $39, respectively, in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, as a result of the sale of the AWS Entities.

 

As a result of the disposal of the AWS Entities, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of subsidiaries of $6,051 to the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. 

 

On May 15, 2017, the Company sold its SDNE subsidiary. SDNE accounted for approximately $165 and $853 in revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $1,671 and $1,360 in revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Under the terms of the sale, the Company was to receive $1,400 in cash and a working capital adjustment of $61 to be paid within 150 days of closing. The Company received cash proceeds of $1,411, with $50 being held in escrow as of June 30, 2017. $1,000 of the proceeds received were included in restricted cash on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017.

 

Based on the Company’s analysis in accordance with ASC 350-20-40-7, the reporting units in the Company’s professional services segment were not impaired as a result of the SDNE sale.

 

As a result of the disposal of SDNE, the Company recorded a gain on disposal of subsidiaries of $585 to the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. 

 

The Company completed the below pro forma data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 to reflect the impact of the sales described above on the Company’s financial results as though the transactions occurred at the beginning of the reported periods:

 

   For the three months ended 
   June 30, 
   2017   2016 
         
Revenue  $7,956   $15,910 
Income (loss) from continuing operations   5,914    (11,506)
Net income (loss)   (2,259)   (12,704)
Net income (loss) attributable to InterCloud Systems, Inc. common stockholders   (2,138)   (12,785)
Income (loss) per share attributable to InterCloud Systems, Inc. common stockholders, basic and diluted:   (0.02)   (0.41)

 

   For the six months ended 
   June 30, 
   2017   2016 
         
Revenue  $17,297   $27,520 
Loss from continuing operations   (13,395)   (17,048)
Net loss   (13,395)   (16,583)
Net loss attributable to InterCloud Systems, Inc. common stockholders   (13,257)   (16,649)
Loss per share attributable to InterCloud Systems, Inc. common stockholders, basic and diluted:   (0.14)   (0.54)

 

 16 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

4. LOANS RECEIVABLE 

 

Loans receivable as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of the following:

 

   June 30,   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
Loans to employees, net of reserves of $891 and $891, respectively, due December 2017  $37   $37 
Loan to third party, due December 2017  $471   $345 
Convertible loan receivable from Mantra , net of premium of $189, due April 2018   1,811    - 
Loans receivable  $2,319   $382 

  

Loans to employees bear interest at rates between 2% and 3% per annum. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the value of the collateral was below the value of the outstanding loans to employees. As a result, the Company recorded a reserve on the balance of loans to employees of $891 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. These employees are considered related parties (refer to Note 13, Related Parties, for further detail).

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company loaned an additional $126 to a third party.

 

On April 25, 2017, the Company sold 80.1% of the assets associated with its AWS Entities subsidiaries (refer to Note 3, Disposals of Subsidiaries, for further detail). In connection with the sale, the Company received from the buyer a one-year convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $2,000, which included a loan premium of $231. This note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The interest income, including amortization of loan premium, associated with this loan receivable during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 amounted to $71, and is included in interest expense on the unaudited condensed consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

The Company evaluated the convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. On April 25, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $231 related to the conversion feature as a derivative asset and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets within other assets.

 

On June 30, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value to be $457. The Company recorded the change in fair value as a gain of $226 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

The fair value of the derivative asset as of June 30, 2017 was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
 
Principal amount and guaranteed interest  $2,009 
      
Conversion price per share    *  
Conversion trigger price per share    None  
Risk free rate   1.02%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   0.82 
Volatility   136%

 

* The conversion price per share is equal to 75% of the lowest VWAP during the fifteen trading days immediately prior to the conversion date.

  

5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

 

Property and equipment as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of the following: 

 

   June 30,   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
Vehicles  $681   $777 
Computers and Office Equipment   635    966 
Equipment   262    764 
Software   -    176 
Total   1,578    2,683 
Less accumulated depreciation   (1,411)   (2,150)
           
Property and equipment, net  $167   $533 

 

Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $52 and $86, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $140 and $172, respectively. 

 17 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Goodwill

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s goodwill as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

   Applications and Infrastructure   Professional Services   Managed Services   Total 
Balance at December 31, 2016  $6,906   $10,081   $6,381   $23,368 
                     
Impairment charge   (621)   (3,146)   -    (3,767)
                     
Disposal   (4,979)   (4,016)   (421)   (9,416)
                     
Balance at June 30, 2017  $1,306   $2,919   $5,960   $10,185 

 

Intangible Assets

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s intangible assets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

      June 30, 2017 
   Estimated Useful Life  Beginning Net Book Value   Additions   Amortization   Amortization Writeoff   Impairment Charge   Disposals   Ending Net Book Value   Accumulated Amortization 
                    
Customer relationship and lists  7-10 yrs  $8,589   $-   $(539)  $1,579   $(69)  $(3,774)  $5,786   $(5,055)
Non-compete agreements  2-3 yrs   248    -    (27)   624    (160)   (685)   -    (1,224)
URL’s  Indefinite   8    -    -    -    (5)   (3)   -    - 
Trade names  1 Year   -    -    -    19    -    (19)   -    (30)
Trade names  Indefinite   3,178    -    -    -    (725)   (982)   1,471    - 
                                            
Total intangible assets     $12,023   $-   $(566)  $2,222   $(959)  $(5,463)  $7,257   $(6,309)

    

 18 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

      December 31, 2016 
   Estimated Useful Life  Beginning Net Book Value   Additions   Amortization   Amortization Writeoff   Impairment Charge   Disposals   Ending Net Book Value   Accumulated Amortization 
                                    
                                    
Customer relationship and lists  7-10 yrs  $9,744   $145   $(1,308)  $8   $-   $-   $8,589   $(6,095)
Non-compete agreements  2-3 yrs   154    498    (287)   7    -    (124)   248    (1,821)
URL’s  Indefinite   8    -    -    -    -    -    8    - 
Trade names  1 Year   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (49)
Trade names  Indefinite   3,178    -    -    -    -    -    3,178    - 
Purchased Software  16 years   3,629    -    (170)   -    (3,459)   -    -    - 
                                            
Total intangible assets     $16,713   $643   $(1,765)  $15   $(3,459)  $(124)  $12,023   $(7,965)

 

Amortization expense related to the identifiable intangible assets was $212 and $457 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization expense related to the identifiable intangible assets was $566 and $940 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively 

 

7. BANK DEBT

 

Bank debt as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of the following:

 

   June 30,   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
Two lines of credit, monthly principal and interest, ranging from $0 to $1, average interest of 8.4%, guaranteed personally by former owners of subsidiary, maturing July 2018  $103   $121 
Equipment finance agreement, monthly principal of $1, maturing February 2020   14    - 
   $117   $121 
Less: Current portion of bank debt   (117)   (121)
           
Long-term portion of bank debt  $-   $- 

  

The interest expense associated with the bank debt during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $4 and $3, respectively. The interest expense associated with the bank debt during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $7 and $5, respectively. There are no financial covenants associated with the bank debt. 

 

 19 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

8. TERM LOANS

 

Term loans as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of the following:

 

   June 30,   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
Former owners of RM Leasing, unsecured, non-interest bearing, due on demand  $2   $2 
           
Promissory note with company under common ownership by former owner of Tropical, 9.75% interest, monthly payments of interest only of $1, unsecured and personally guaranteed by officer, matured in November 2016   -    106 
           
8% convertible promissory note, London Bay - VL Holding Company, LLC, unsecured, maturing October 2017   7,408    7,408 
           
8% convertible promissory note, WV VL Holding Corp., unsecured, maturing October 2017   7,003    7,003 
           
8% convertible promissory note, Tim Hannibal, unsecured, maturing October 2017   1,215    1,215 
           
12% senior convertible note, unsecured, Dominion Capital, matured in January 2017, net of debt discount of $29   -    1,170 
           
12% convertible note, Richard Smithline, unsecured, matured in January 2017, net of debt discount of $0 and $2, respectively   117    360 
           
Senior secured convertible debenture, JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd., bearing interest of 4.67%, maturing in May 2019, net of debt discount of $1,130 and $3,136, respectively   3,321    1,900 
           
Senior secured convertible note, JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd., bearing interest at 4.67%, maturing in May 2019, net of debt discount of $10 and $1,668, respectively   231    2,080 
           
Senior secured note, JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd., bearing interest at 4.67%, maturing in May 2019, net of debt discount of $28 and $234, respectively   475    358 
           
4.67% convertible note, MEF I, L.P., unsecured, maturing in May 2019, net of debt discount of $86   446    - 
           
6% senior convertible term promissory note, unsecured, Dominion Capital. maturing January 31, 2018, net of debt discount of $19   51    - 
           
12% senior convertible note, unsecured, Dominion Capital, maturing in November 2017, net of debt discount of $27 and $65, respectively   513    475 
           
Receivables Purchase Agreement with Dominion Capital, net of debt discount of $0 and $44, respectively   -    430 
           
Promissory note issued to Trinity Hall, 3% interest, unsecured, maturing in January 2018   500    500 
           
2.5% convertible promissory note, RDW Capital LLC, maturing in April 2018, net of debt discount of $19   81    - 
           
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, between 2% and 10% interest, matured on July 1, 2016, unsecured   1,421    4,235 
           
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, 3% interest, maturing on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $457 and $860, respectively   3,916    3,513 
           
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, 6.5% interest, matured on July 1, 2016, unsecured   390    390 
           
Former owner of IPC, unsecured, 8% interest, matured on May 30, 2016, due on demand   5,755    5,755 
           
Former owner of IPC, unsecured, 15% interest, due on demand   75    75 
    32,920    36,975 
Less: Current portion of term loans   (30,551)   (30,742)
           
Long-term portion term loans, net of debt discount  $2,369   $6,233 

 

 20 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The interest expense, including amortization of debt discounts, associated with the term loans payable during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $1,244 and $3,146, respectively. The interest expense, including amortization of debt discounts, associated with the term loans payable during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $5,370 and $7,600, respectively.

 

With the exception of the notes outstanding to RM Leasing, all term loans are subordinate to the JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. and JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. Notes, which are guaranteed by all assets of the Company.

  

Term Loan – 8% Convertible Promissory Notes

 

Effective as of October 9, 2014, the Company consummated the acquisition of all of the outstanding membership interests of VaultLogix and its affiliated entities for an aggregate purchase price of $36,796. The purchase price for the acquisition was payable to the sellers as follows: (i) $16,385 in cash, (ii) 252,173 shares of the Company’s common stock and (iii) $15,626 in unsecured convertible promissory notes. The closing payments are subject to customary working capital adjustments.

 

The promissory notes accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum, and all principal and interest accrued under the promissory notes is payable on October 9, 2017. The promissory notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $25.48 per share. A portion of the principal amount of the promissory notes equal to 20% of the principal amount on the closing date were not convertible until January 9, 2016.

 

On a date when (i) the shares are freely tradeable without restriction or volume limitations under Rule 144, and (ii) the average closing price of the Company’s common stock is 105% or higher of the conversion price on the three (3) trading days immediately prior to such date, the Company may deliver notice to the holders of the promissory notes electing to convert some or all of the outstanding amounts owed under the promissory notes into common stock at the applicable conversion price. Additionally, if on or after the maturity date, (i) the Company is restricted or otherwise unable to pay in cash all outstanding amounts under the promissory notes, (ii) the promissory notes have not otherwise been paid in full within ten business days following the maturity date, or (iii) the Company is not at such time entitled to effect a forced conversion, then, in the event that both (i) and (iii) above apply, the Company, and in the event that both (ii) and (iii) above apply, the holders of the promissory notes, shall have the right to convert all outstanding amounts owing under the promissory notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the three trading days immediately preceding the date of such conversion.

 

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had not forced any conversions.

 

On July 18, 2017, the holder of the promissory note in the principal amount of $1,215 assigned the full outstanding amount of the note to a third party, RDW Capital, LLC (“RDW”) (refer to Note 16, Subsequent Events, for further detail).

 

Term Loan – Dominion Capital LLC August 6, 2015 Senior Convertible Note

 

On August 6, 2015, the Company entered into a senior convertible note agreement with the investor whereby the Company issued a promissory note in the original principal amount of $2,105, with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, which had a maturity date of January 6, 2017. At the election of the investor, the note was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $8.00 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the agreement. The investor could have elected to have the Company redeem the senior convertible note upon the occurrence of certain events, including the Company’s completion of a $10,000 underwritten offering of the Company’s common stock. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the August 6, 2015 convertible note.

 

The August 6, 2015 senior convertible note matured on January 6, 2017 and was due on demand.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the investor who held the August 6, 2015 senior convertible note converted the remaining principal outstanding of $1,199 into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 11, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the investor who held the August 6, 2015 senior convertible note converted $234 of principal into shares of the Company’s common stock. As a result of these conversions, the Company recorded a gain on conversion of debt of $197 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

 

 21 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

Term Loan – Dominion Capital LLC September 15, 2016 Promissory Note and November 4, 2016 Exchange Agreement

 

On September 15, 2016, the Company received cash proceeds of $500, from the sale of a term promissory note. The term promissory note originally had a maturity date of November 4, 2016 and could have been paid in either cash or common stock at the option of the lender. If common stock of the Company was used to make such payment, then the shares would have been delivered by the third business day following the maturity date and would have equaled the total amount including principal and interest, at a conversion price mutually agreed to by both parties at conversion. Interest at a rate of 12% per annum was to be accrued until the maturity day. The Company was to pay a minimum of guaranteed interest of $30 and lender legal fees of $5 out of proceeds of the note. The note could have been redeemed at any time prior to maturity at an amount equal to 110% of the outstanding principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest on the note. The redemption premium (10%) could have been paid in cash or common stock at the option of the Company. If the Company’s common stock was used to make such payment, then such shares would have been delivered by the third business day following the maturity date, or date of demand, as applicable, at a mutually agreed upon conversion price by both parties.

 

On November 4, 2016, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with the holder of the September 15, 2016 term promissory note. The principal amount was increased by $40 to $540, which included a debt discount of $101, and the note became convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock. The maturity date of the note was extended from November 4, 2016 to November 4, 2017. Interest at a rate of 12% per annum is to be accrued until the maturity day. The new note has monthly amortization payments of $86 that were scheduled to begin on May 4, 2017 and ending on the maturity date. These monthly amortization payments can be offset by monthly conversions. The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $0.40, or (ii) 75% of the lowest VWAP day for the 15 days prior to the conversion date. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of $146 in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the November 4, 2016 convertible note.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the holder of the November 4, 2016 promissory note did not convert any principal or accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Dominion Capital LLC Receivables Purchase Agreements

 

On December 30, 2016, the Company entered into a receivables purchase agreement whereby the Company sold approximately $474 of receivables in exchange for $430. The principal amount of the loan is $474, which includes a debt discount of $44.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company received and remitted $474 of the receivables sold in payment of the loan.

 

 22 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

Term Loan - Dominion Capital LLC January 31, 2017 Senior Convertible Promissory Note

 

On January 31, 2017, the Company entered into a senior convertible promissory note with Dominion Capital, LLC in the original principal amount of $70, with interest accruing at the rate of 6% per annum, which matures on January 31, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $0.40 or (ii) 80% of the lowest VWAP in the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the January 31, 2017 convertible note.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the holder of the January 31, 2017 promissory note did not convert any principal or accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Richard Smithline Senior Convertible Note

 

On August 6, 2015, the Company issued to Richard Smithline a senior convertible note in the principal amount of $526, with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, which matured on January 11, 2017. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $8.00 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the agreement. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the Richard Smithline Senior Convertible Note.

 

Pursuant to the Smithline senior convertible note, the Company was required to meet current public information requirements under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, which it had failed to do prior to June 30, 2016. Thus, on July 20, 2016, the Company agreed to add $55 to the principal amount of the Smithline senior convertible note as of July 1, 2016 and the investor waived its right to call an event of default under the note with respect to the Company’s failure to meet the public information requirement for the period ending June 30, 2016. On September 1, 2016, the Company agreed to add $97 to the principal amount of the Smithline senior convertible note as of the date of its last monthly amortization to compensate the investor for certain damages relating to noncompliance with certain provisions of the senior convertible note. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $167 during the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the investor who holds the Smithline senior convertible note converted $246 of principal into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 11, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the investor who holds the Smithline senior convertible note converted $218 of principal into shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Principal of $117 and $363 remained outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

 23 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. Senior Secured Convertible Debenture

 

On December 29, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. (“JGB Waltham”) whereby the Company issued to JGB Waltham, for gross proceeds of $7,500, a $500 original issue discount senior secured convertible debenture in the principal amount of $7,500. The debenture had a maturity date of June 30, 2017, bore interest at 10% per annum, and was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $5.32 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the debenture. The Company was required to pay interest to JGB Waltham on the aggregate unconverted and then outstanding principal amount of the debenture in arrears each calendar month and on the maturity date in cash, or, at the Company’s option and subject to the Company satisfying certain equity conditions, in shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, December 29, 2016 was an interest payment date on which the Company was required to pay to JGB Waltham a fixed amount, which was additional interest under the debenture, equal to $350 in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination thereof. Commencing on February 29, 2016, JGB Waltham had the right, at its option, to require the Company to redeem up to $350 of the outstanding principal amount of the debenture per calendar month, which redemption could have been made in cash or, at the Company’s option and subject to satisfying certain equity conditions, in shares of the Company’s common stock. The debenture was guaranteed to by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and was secured by all assets of the Company. The total cash received by the Company as a result of this agreement was $3,730.

 

On May 17, 2016, the Company entered into a Forbearance and Amendment Agreement (the “Debenture Forbearance Agreement”) with JGB Waltham pursuant to which JGB Waltham agreed to forbear action with respect to certain existing defaults in accordance with the terms of the Debenture Forbearance Agreement. The defaults, which were not monetary in nature, related to the Company’s inability to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

 

In connection with the execution of the Debenture Forbearance Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Waltham an amended and restated senior secured convertible debenture (the “Amended and Restated Debenture”), which amended the original 10% senior secured convertible debenture issued to JGB Waltham on December 29, 2015 by: (i) reducing the conversion price at which the original debenture converts into shares of the Company’s common stock; and (ii) eliminating the provisions that provided for (A) the issuance of common stock at a discount to the market price of the common stock and (B) certain anti-dilution protections.

 

The Amended and Restated Debenture was issued in the principal amount of $7,500, has a maturity date of May 31, 2019, bears interest at 0.67% per annum, and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed conversion price equal to $3.20 per share, subject to equitable adjustments as set forth in the Amended and Restated Debenture. The Company shall pay interest to JGB Waltham on the aggregate unconverted and then outstanding principal amount of the Amended and Restated Debenture, payable monthly in arrears as of the last trading day of each calendar month and on May 31, 2019, in cash. In addition, the Company shall pay JGB Waltham an additional amount equal to 7.5% of the outstanding principal amount on the Amended and Restated Debenture on each of May 31, 2018 and May 31, 2019, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Amended and Restated Debenture. JGB Waltham has the right, at its option, to require the Company to redeem up to $169 of the outstanding principal amount of the Amended and Restated Debenture plus the then-accrued and unpaid interest thereon each calendar month, in cash. The Amended and Restated Debenture contains standard events of default.

 

 24 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

In connection with the execution of the Debenture Forbearance Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Waltham a senior secured note (the “2.7 Note”), dated May 17, 2016, in the principal amount of $2,745 that matures on May 31, 2019, bears interest at 0.67% per annum and contains standard events of default.

 

The Company accounted for the Debenture Forbearance Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company extinguished the December 29, 2015 senior secured convertible debenture in the then-current principal amount of $6,100 and recorded a new senior secured convertible debenture at its new fair value of $3,529 on the consolidated balance sheet as of May 17, 2016. As a result of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,457 on the consolidated statement of operations as of May 17, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features associated with the December 29, 2015 senior secured convertible debenture. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.

 

On May 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord, JGB Waltham, VaultLogix, and the Guarantors thereto (the “Amended Agreement”) pursuant to which (i) JGB Concord permitted the Company to withdraw $172 from the Blocked Account (as defined in the original debenture), and (ii) JGB Concord permitted the Company to withdraw $328 from the Deposit Account (as defined in the original note) and, in exchange for the foregoing, (i) VaultLogix guaranteed the obligations of, and provide security for, the Amended and Restated Debenture and the 2.7 Note, (ii) the Company’s subsidiaries guaranteed all indebtedness due to JGB Concord under the Amended and Restated Note and 5.2 Note, and (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries pledged their assets as security for all obligations owed to JGB Concord under the Amended and Restated Note and the 5.2 Note in accordance with the terms of an Additional Debtor Joinder, dated May 23, 2016, pursuant to which the Company and each additional party thereto agreed to be bound by the terms of that certain Security Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2016, made by VaultLogix in favor of the secured party thereto (the “February Security Agreement”). In addition, the interest rates on the Amended and Restated Note and the 5.2 Note were amended from 0.67% per annum to 1.67% per annum.

 

The Company accounted for this Amended Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company accounted for the Amended Agreement as a debt modification and adjusted the fair value of the associated derivative liabilities to its fair value as of May 23, 2016. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.

 

On June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment agreement with JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. (“JGB Concord”) and JGB Waltham pursuant to which, (i) JGB Waltham and JGB Concord released to the Company an aggregate of $1,500 from the Deposit Account (as defined in the original note). Upon the release of the funds (i) the JGB Waltham senior secured convertible debenture (the “December Debenture”) was amended to increase the Applicable Interest Rate (as defined in the original note) by 3.0% effective on July 1, 2016; (ii) the December Debenture was amended to increase the annual rate of interest by 3.0% effective on July 1, 2016; (iii) the JGB Concord senior secured convertible note (the “February Convertible Note”) was amended to increase the Applicable Interest Rate (as defined in the original February Convertible Note) by 3.0%, effective on July 1, 2016; and (iv) the February Note was amended to increase the annual rate of interest by 3.0%, effective on July 1, 2016. After giving effect to the foregoing annual rate of interest on each December Debenture and February Convertible Note as of July 1, 2016, was 4.67%. As additional consideration for the release of the funds, the Company issued 225,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on June 23, 2016 to JGB Concord.

 

The Company accounted for the June 23, 2016 amendment agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company extinguished the May 17, 2016 Debenture Forbearance Agreement in the principal amount of $6,100 and recorded on the balance sheet as of June 23, 2016 a new senior secured convertible debenture at its new fair value of $4,094. As a result of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $483 on the consolidated statement of operations as of June 23, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features associated with the May 17, 2016 Debenture Forbearance Agreement. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.

 

On September 1, 2016, the Company entered into an Amendment Agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham pursuant to which, JGB Waltham and JGB Concord (i) waived certain covenant violations and defaults, (ii) agreed to a specified application of the Cash Collateral (as defined in the Amendment Agreement) in partial satisfaction of the obligations owed under the December Debenture, the 2.7 Note, and the February Convertible Note, and in full satisfaction of the 5.2 Note, and (iii) certain provisions of the December Debenture, the 2.7 Note, and the February Convertible Note be amended.

 

 25 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The Company also (i) issued warrants, with an expiration date of December 31, 2017, to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per share, (ii) issued warrants, with an expiration date of December 31, 2017, to purchase 875,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share ((i) and (ii), the “JGB Warrants”). The Company determined that the fair value of the JGB Warrants was $972, which was included in common stock warrants within the stockholders’ deficit section on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016. As of March 31, 2017, these warrants were reclassified to a liability account (refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail).

 

In connection with the execution of the September 1, 2016 Amendment Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Waltham the Third Amended and Restated Senior Secured Convertible Debenture (the “Amended and Restated Debenture”), in order to, among other things, amend the December Debenture to (i) provide that the Company may prepay such debenture upon prior notice at a 10% premium, (ii) modify the conversion price at which such debenture converts into common stock from a fixed price of $3.20 to the lowest of (a) $0.8172 per share, (b) 80% of the average VWAPs (as defined in the Amended and Restated Debenture) for each of the five consecutive trading days immediately prior to the applicable conversion, and (c) 85% of the VWAP (as defined in the Amended and Restated Debenture) for the trading day immediately preceding the applicable conversion (the “Conversion Price”), and (iii) eliminate three additional 7.5% payments due to JGB Waltham in 2017, 2018 and 2019, as per such debenture. Further, in connection with the execution of the Amendment Agreement, the Company executed the Amended and Restated Senior Secured Note (the “Amended and Restated 2.7 Note”), in order to, among other things, amend the 2.7 Note to provide that JGB Waltham may convert such note into shares of common stock at the applicable Conversion Price at any time and from time to time. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the Company’s accounting for the Amended and Restated 2.7 Note.

 

The Company accounted for the September 1, 2016 amendment agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $274 on the consolidated statement of operations as of September 1, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.

 

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Waltham and JGB Concord in order to, among other things, (i) obtain the consent of JGB Waltham and JGB Concord to the Highwire Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”); (ii) amend the conversion price of the JGB Waltham Debenture, JGB Waltham 2.7 Note, and the JGB Concord Debenture to the lower of (a) $0.16 per share and (b) 80% of the lowest daily VWAP (as defined in the Debenture) for the 30 consecutive trading days immediately prior to the applicable conversion; (iii) apply $3,625 of the purchase price received in connection with the APA to payments to JGB Waltham and JGB Concord in respect of the convertible note, as more particularly set forth in the consent.

 

The Company accounted for the amended conversion price in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt related to the JGB Waltham debenture and the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note of $389 and $35, respectively, on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features (refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction).

 

On March 9, 2017, JGB Waltham, the Company, and a third-party investor effectuated a two-part exchange with respect to a portion of the Amended and Restated Debenture in which JGB Waltham assigned a portion of its interest in the Amended and Restated Debenture (the “Assigned Debt”) to MEF I, L.P. pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2017. Simultaneously therewith, the Company, entered into an Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2017 (the “Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company issued to MEF I, L.P. a 4.67% Convertible Promissory Note, dated as of March 9, 2017, in the principal amount of $550 (the “Exchange Note”) (refer to MEF I, L.P. section below for additional details).

 

The Company accounted for the assignment of debt in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $676 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features (refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction).

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Waltham December Debenture of $536 and $24, respectively. The cash paid for principal was from proceeds of the November 18, 2016 and December 30, 2016 Receivables Purchase Agreements.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Waltham December Debenture of $83 and $152, respectively. Of the $152 of interest paid, $18 was from proceeds of the sale of the Company’s Highwire division.

 

 26 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note of $2,000 and $25, respectively. The cash paid for principal was applied from the Company’s restricted cash balance

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note of $89 and $12, respectively. Of the $12 of interest paid, $2 was from proceeds of the sale of the Company’s Highwire division.

 

Principal of $4,451 and $5,034 related to the JGB Waltham December Debenture remained outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Principal of $503 and $592 related to the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note remained outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. Senior Secured Convertible Note

 

On February 17, 2016, the Company entered into a securities exchange agreement by and among the Company, VaultLogix, and JGB Concord, whereby the Company exchanged the White Oak Global Advisors, LLC promissory note and subsequently assigned to JGB Concord a new 8.25% senior secured convertible note dated February 18, 2016 in the principal amount of $11,601. As a result of the assignment, the obligations of the Company and VaultLogix to White Oak Global Advisors, LLC were satisfied.

 

The note issued to JGB Concord had a maturity date of February 18, 2019, bore interest at 8.25% per annum, and was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to the lowest of: (a) $8.00 per share, (b) 80% of the average of the volume weighted average prices for each of the five consecutive trading days immediately prior to the applicable conversion date, and (c) 85% of the volume weighted average price for the trading day immediately preceding the applicable conversion date, subject to adjustment as set forth in the note. Interest on the senior secured convertible note was due in arrears each calendar month in cash, or, at the Company’s option and subject to stockholder approval, in shares of the Company’s common stock. Commencing on the stockholder approval date, JGB Concord had the right, at its option, to convert the senior secured convertible note, in whole or in part, into shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations. The senior secured convertible note was secured by all assets of VaultLogix as well as a cash collateral blocked deposit account.

 

On May 17, 2016, the Company entered into a forbearance and amendment agreement (the “Note Forbearance Agreement”) with VaultLogix and JGB Concord, pursuant to which JGB Concord agreed to forbear action with respect to certain existing defaults in accordance with the terms of the Note Forbearance Agreement. The defaults, which were not monetary in nature, related to the Company’s inability to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

 

In connection with the execution of the Note Forbearance Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Concord an amended and restated senior secured convertible note (the “Amended and Restated Note”) in order to amend the original note to JGB Concord by: (i) reducing the conversion price at which the note converts into shares of the Company’s common; and (ii) eliminating provisions that provided for (A) the issuance of common stock at a discount to the market price of the common stock and (B) certain anti-dilution protections.

 

The Amended and Restated Note was issued in the aggregate principal amount of $11,601, has a maturity date of May 31, 2019, bears interest at 0.67% per annum, and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed conversion price of $3.20 per share, subject to equitable adjustments as set forth in the Amended and Restated Note. The Company and VaultLogix shall pay interest to JGB Concord on the aggregate unconverted and then outstanding principal amount of the Amended and Restated Note, payable monthly in arrears as of the last trading day of each calendar month and on May 31, 2019, in cash. In addition, the Company shall pay to JGB Concord an additional amount equal to 7.5% of the outstanding principal amount on the Amended and Restated Note on each of May 31, 2018, and May 31, 2019, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Amended and Restated Note. JGB Concord has the right, at its option, to require the Company to redeem up to $322 of the outstanding principal amount of the Amended and Restated Note plus the then accrued and unpaid interest thereon each calendar month in cash. The Amended and Restated Note contains standard events of default.

 

The Company accounted for the Note Forbearance Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company extinguished the February 17, 2016 senior secured convertible note in the principal amount of $11,601 and recorded a new senior secured convertible debenture at its new fair value of $6,711 on the consolidated balance sheet as of May 17, 2016. As a result of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2,772 on the consolidated statement of operations as of May 17, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features associated with the February 17, 2016 senior secured convertible note. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.

 

 27 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

In connection with the execution of the Note Forbearance Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Concord a senior secured note (the “5.2 Note”), dated May 17, 2016, in the principal amount of $5,220 that matures on May 31, 2019, bears interest at 0.67% per annum, and contains standard events of default.

 

On May 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord, JGB Waltham, VaultLogix, and the Guarantors thereto (the “Amended Agreement”) pursuant to which (i) JGB Concord permitted the Company to withdraw $172 from the Blocked Account (as defined in the original debenture), and (ii) JGB Concord permitted the Company to withdraw $328 from the Deposit Account (as defined in the original note) and, in exchange for the foregoing, (i) VaultLogix guaranteed the obligations of, and provide security for, the Amended and Restated Debenture and the 2.7 Note, (ii) the Company’s subsidiaries guaranteed all indebtedness due to JGB Concord under the Amended and Restated Note and 5.2 Note, and (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries pledged their assets as security for all obligations owed to JGB Concord under the Amended and Restated Note and the 5.2 Note in accordance with the terms of an Additional Debtor Joinder, dated May 23, 2016, pursuant to which the Company and each additional party thereto agreed to be bound by the terms of that certain Security Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2016, made by VaultLogix in favor of the secured party thereto (the “February Security Agreement”). In addition, the interest rates on the Amended and Restated Note and the 5.2 Note were amended from 0.67% to 1.67%.

 

The Company accounted for this Amended Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company accounted for the Amended Agreement as a debt modification and adjusted the fair value of the associated derivative liabilities to their fair value as of May 23, 2016. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.

 

On June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham pursuant to which, (i) JGB Waltham and JGB Concord released to the Company an aggregate of $1,500 from the Deposit Account (as defined in the original note). Upon the release of the funds (i) the JGB Waltham senior secured convertible debenture (the “December Debenture”) was amended to increase the Applicable Interest Rate (as defined in the original note) by 3.0% to take effect on July 1, 2016; (ii) the December Debenture was amended to increase the annual rate of interest by 3.0% to take effect on July 1, 2016; (iii) the JGB Concord senior secured convertible note (the “February Convertible Note”) was amended to increase the Applicable Interest Rate (as defined in the original February Convertible Note) by 3.0%, to take effect on July 1, 2016; and (iv) the February Note was amended to increase the annual rate of interest by 3.0%, to take effect on July 1, 2016. After giving effect to the foregoing annual rate of interest on each December Debenture and February Convertible Note as of July 1, 2016, was 4.67%. As additional consideration for the release of the funds, the Company issued 225,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on June 23, 2016 to JGB Concord, and agreed to a make-whole provision whereby the Company will pay JGB Concord in cash the difference between $3.76 per share of the Company’s common stock and the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock sixty days after the shares of the Company’s common stock are freely tradable. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the Company’s accounting for the JGB Concord make-whole provision.

 

The Company accounted for the June 23, 2016 amendment agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company extinguished the May 17, 2016 Debenture Forbearance Note in the principal amount of $11,601 and recorded a new senior secured convertible note at its new fair value of $7,786 on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 23, 2016. As a result of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,150 on the consolidated statement of operations as of June 23, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features associated with the May 17, 2016 Debenture Forbearance Note. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.

 

In connection with the execution of the September 1, 2016 Amendment Agreement, the Company executed the Second Amended and Restated Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “Amended and Restated Convertible Note”), in order to, among other things, amend the Convertible Note to (i) increase the interest rate payable thereon from 0.67% to 4.67%, (ii) provide that the Company may prepay the Amended and Restated Convertible Note upon prior notice at a 10% premium, (iii) provide that the Holder Affiliate may convert its interest in the Amended and Restated Convertible Note into shares of Common Stock at the applicable Conversion Price, and (iv) eliminate three additional 7.5% payments due to the Holder Affiliate in 2017, 2018, and 2019, as per the Convertible Note.

 

 28 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The Company accounted for the September 1, 2016 amendment agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,187 on the consolidated statement of operations as of September 1, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.

 

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Waltham and JGB Concord in order to, among other things, (i) obtain the consent of JGB Waltham and JGB Concord to the Highwire Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”); (ii) amend the conversion price of the JGB Waltham Debenture, JGB Waltham 2.7 Note, and the JGB Concord Debenture to the lower of (a) $0.16 per share and (b) 80% of the lowest daily VWAP (as defined in the Debenture) for the thirty consecutive trading days immediately prior to the applicable conversion; (iii) apply $3,625 of the purchase price received in connection with the APA to payments to JGB Waltham and JGB Concord in respect of the convertible note, as more particularly set forth in the consent.

 

The Company accounted for the amended conversion price in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt related to the JGB Concord debenture of $71 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features (refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction).

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Concord February Debenture of $391 and $73, respectively. The cash paid for principal was from proceeds of the November 18, 2016 Receivables Purchase Agreement. $31 of the cash paid for interest was from proceeds of the December 30, 2016 Receivables Purchase Agreement.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Concord February Debenture of $2,558 and $30, respectively. Proceeds from the sale of the Company’s Highwire division were used to pay principal and interest of $2,526 and $12, respectively, along with an early payment penalty of $253.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, JGB Concord converted $951 of principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 11, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information).

 

Principal of $241 and $3,748 related to the JGB Concord February Debenture remained outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

MEF I, L.P. Exchange Note

 

On March 9, 2017, JGB Waltham, the Company, and a third-party investor effectuated a two-part exchange with respect to a portion of the Amended and Restated Debenture in which JGB Waltham assigned a portion of its interest in the Amended and Restated Debenture (the “Assigned Debt”) to MEF I, L.P. pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2017. Simultaneously therewith, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2017 (the “Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company issued to MEF I, L.P. a 4.67% convertible promissory note, dated as of March 9, 2017, in the aggregate principal amount of $550 (the “Exchange Note”). The Exchange Note is convertible at the lower of (i) $0.16 or (ii) 80% of the lowest VWAP in the 30 trading days prior to the conversion date (refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the Exchange Note).

 

 29 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the investor who holds the 4.67% promissory note converted $19 of principal and related interest into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 11, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information).

 

Trinity Hall Promissory Note

 

On December 30, 2016, the Company issued to Trinity Hall a promissory note in the principal amount of $500, with interest accruing at the rate of 3% per annum, which matures on January 1, 2018. This note was issued upon assignment to Trinity Hall of certain related party notes payable to Mark Munro (refer to Note 13, Related Parties, for further detail).

 

RDW April 3, 2017 2.5 % Convertible Promissory Note

 

On April 3, 2017, Scott Davis, a former officer of the Company assigned $100 of his promissory note in the original principal amount of $250, reduced to $225 based on a $25 conversion into common stock, to RDW. As consideration for the assignment, RDW paid Scott Davis $40. The note was convertible at a price of $8.88 and was due on demand. As of April 3, 2017, the outstanding amount of principal and accrued interest for the note was $225 and $57, respectively. Subsequent to the assignment of $100 to RDW, the remainder of the note was forgiven. The original note was included within notes payable, related parties on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. Per ASC 470-50-40-2, debt extinguishment transactions between related parties are in essence a capital contribution from a related party. As a result, rather than recording a gain or loss on extinguishment of debt, the Company recorded $182 to additional paid-in capital on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017.

 

RDW then exchanged this original note for a new 2.5% convertible promissory note with a principal amount of $100 due April 3, 2018. This conversion price in effect on any conversion date is equal to 75% of the average of the five lowest VWAPS over the seven trading days prior to the date of conversion (refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the RDW 2.5% convertible note). The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $14 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, which includes all extinguishment accounting for the period in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the investor holding the 2.5% convertible promissory note did not convert any principal or accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Restructuring of Forward Investments, LLC Promissory Notes and Working Capital Loan

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company restructured the terms of certain promissory notes issued by it to a related party investor, Forward Investments, LLC, in order to extend the maturity dates thereof, reduce the seniority and reduce the interest rate accruing thereon. The following notes were restructured as follows:

 

  notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC in the aggregate principal amount of $3,650 that bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum, had the maturity date extended from June 30, 2015 to July 1, 2016. These notes matured on July 1, 2016;

 

  notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC in the principal amount of $2,825 that bear interest at the rate of 2% per annum, had the maturity date extended from June 30, 2015 to July 1, 2016. These notes matured on July 1, 2016; and
     
  notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC in the aggregate principal amount of $2,645 were converted from senior notes to junior notes, had the interest rate reduced from 18% to 3% per annum, had the maturity date extended by approximately three years to January 1, 2018, and originally were convertible at a conversion price of $25.44 per share until the Convertible Debentures were repaid in full and thereafter $9.40 per share, subject to further adjustment as set forth therein.

 

In connection with such restructuring, Forward Investments, LLC agreed to lend to the Company an amount substantially similar to the accrued interest the Company owed to Forward Investments, LLC on the restructured notes. In consideration for such restructuring and additional payments made by Forward Investments, LLC to the Company, the Company issued to Forward Investments, LLC an additional convertible note in the original principal amount of $1,730 with an interest rate of 3% per annum, a maturity date of January 1, 2018, and an initial conversion price of $25.44 per share until the Convertible Debentures were repaid in full and thereafter $9.40 per share, subject to further adjustment as set forth therein, and provided Forward Investments, LLC the option to lend the Company an additional $8,000 in the form of convertible notes similar to the existing convertible notes of the Company issued to Forward Investments, LLC. The convertible note was issued to Forward Investments, LLC as an incentive to restructure the above-mentioned notes and resulted in the Company recording a loss on modification of debt of $1,508 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations as of March 31, 2015.

 

 30 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

As part of the restructuring, Forward Investments, LLC agreed to convert $390 of accrued interest on the above-mentioned loans to a new note bearing interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum that matured on July 1, 2016.

 

In conjunction with the extension of the 2% and 10% convertible notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, the Company recorded an additional $1,916 of debt discount at the date of the restructuring.

 

The Company has entered into an agreement with Forward Investments, LLC permitting Forward Investments, LLC to convert its debt into the Company’s common stock at a 5% discount to the daily market price. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, Forward Investments, LLC converted $2,814 aggregate principal amount of promissory notes into an aggregate of 40,490,173 shares of the Company’s common stock. Refer to Note 11, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information.

 

During July 2017, the Company determined that Forward Investments was not a related party and reclassified debt owed to Forward Investments from related party debt to term loans. The effective date of the reclassification was January 1, 2016 (refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for further detail).

 

Convertible Promissory Note to Frank Jadevaia, Former Owner of IPC

 

On January 1, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of IPC. As part of the purchase price for the acquisition, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Frank Jadevaia, then President of the Company, in the original principal amount of $6,255. The convertible promissory note accrues interest at the rate of 8% per annum, and all principal and interest accruing thereunder was originally due and payable on December 31, 2014. At the election of Mr. Jadevaia, the convertible promissory note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $67.96 per share (subject to equitable adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits, recapitalizations and other similar events). The Company can elect to force the conversion of the convertible promissory note if the Company’s common stock is trading at a price greater than or equal to $67.96 for ten consecutive trading days. This note is subordinated until the Senior Secured Convertible Notes issued to the JGB entities are paid in full.

 

On December 31, 2014, the Company and Mr. Jadevaia agreed to a modification of the convertible promissory note. The term of the convertible promissory note was extended to May 30, 2016 and, in consideration for this modification, the Company issued to Mr. Jadevaia 25,000 shares of common stock.

 

On May 19, 2015, Mr. Jadevaia assigned $500 of principal related to the convertible promissory note and the assignees converted all $500 principal amount of such note into 58,046 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair value of $13.52 per common share.

 

On May 30, 2016, the note matured and is now due on demand.

 

On November 4, 2016, Mr. Jadevaia resigned from his role as the Company’s President. During July 2017, the Company determined that Frank Jadevaia was no longer a related party and reclassified his note from related party debt to term loans. The effective date of the reclassification was November 4, 2016 (refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for further detail).

 

Promissory Note to Former Owner of Tropical

 

In August 2011, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Tropical, the Company assumed a promissory note in the principal amount of $106. On April 25, 2017, the holder of the note forgave the remaining balance of principal and interest and cancelled the promissory note. As of April 25, 2017, the note had accrued interest of $25. As a result of the cancellation of the note, the Company recognized a gain on fair value of extinguishment of $131 in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

 31 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

9. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

 

The Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in its convertible debt and freestanding instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“ASC Topic 815”).

 

MidMarket Warrants

 

The Company issued warrants to the lenders under the MidMarket Loan Agreement in 2012. These warrants were outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

 

The terms of the warrants issued in September 2012 originally provided, among other things, that the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants amounted to 11.5% of the Company’s fully-diluted outstanding common stock and common stock equivalents, whether the common stock equivalents were fully vested and exercisable or not, and that the initial exercise price of such warrants was $20.00 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment. Pursuant to an amendment to the loan agreement, on March 22, 2013, the number of shares for which the warrants are exercisable was fixed at 58,559 shares. On September 17, 2012, when the warrants were issued, the Company recorded a derivative liability in the amount of $194. The amount was recorded as a debt discount and was being amortized over the original life of the related loans. The amount of the derivative liability was computed by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is not materially different from a binomial lattice valuation methodology, to determine the value of the warrants issued. In accordance with ASC Topic 480, the warrants are classified as liabilities because there is a put feature that requires the Company to repurchase any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the warrants. The derivative liability associated with this debt is revalued each reporting period and the increase or decrease is recorded to the consolidated statement of operations under the caption “change in fair value of derivative instruments.” At each reporting date, the Company performs an analysis of the fair value of the warrants using the binomial lattice pricing model and adjusts the fair value accordingly.

 

On September 17, 2016, the fourth anniversary date of the warrants, the Company failed to meet the minimum adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization provisions set forth within the original warrant agreement. As such, the expiration date of the warrants was extended to September 17, 2018.

 

On June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company used a binomial lattice pricing model to determine the fair value of the derivative liability of the warrants on those dates, and determined the fair value was $0. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 as a gain of $23. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 as a gain of $10.

 

The fair value of the warrant derivative liability as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was calculated using a binomial lattice pricing model with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
         
Fair value of Company’s common stock  $0.12   $0.12 
Volatility (closing prices of 3-4 comparable public companies, including the Company’s historical volatility)   112%   120%
Exercise price per share  $4.00 - $5.00    $4.00 - $5.00  
Estimated life   1.2 years    1.7 years 
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)   1.31%   0.12%

 

Forward Investments, LLC Convertible Feature

 

On February 4, 2014 and March 28, 2014, Forward Investments, LLC made convertible loans to the Company for working capital purposes in the amounts of $1,800 and $1,200, respectively. Such loans are evidenced by convertible promissory notes that bear interest at the rate of 2% and 10% per annum, were to mature on June 30, 2015 and originally were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $25.44 per share.

 

The fair value of the embedded conversion feature at the date of issuance was $8,860. The Company recorded a debt discount of $6,475 and a loss on debt discount of $2,385. The debt discount is being amortized over the life of the loans. The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation on the date of issuance to determine the fair value of the embedded conversion feature.

 

On October 22, 2014, the two convertible promissory notes were modified to reduce the initial conversion price of $25.44 to $15.72. As a result, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value on the date of modification. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability as a loss on fair value of derivative instruments of $310.

 

 32 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company and Forward Investments, LLC restructured the two promissory notes in order to extend the maturity dates thereof, reduce the seniority and reduce the interest rate accruing thereon (refer to Note 13, Related Parties, for further detail). The Company accounted for this restructuring of the promissory notes as a debt modification under ASC Topic 470-50. As part of the modification, the Company analyzed the embedded conversion feature and recorded a loss on fair value of derivative instruments of $2,600 on the consolidated statement of operations.

 

In conjunction with the issuance of the 6.5% and 3% convertible notes issued on March 4, 2015, the Company recorded an additional derivative liability as a debt discount in the amount of $260 and $1,970, respectively, on the date of the issuance of the notes.

 

The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loans. The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation on the date of issuance to determine the fair value of the embedded conversion features.

 

On August 3, 2015, the Company and Forward Investments, LLC agreed to reset the conversion price of the convertible notes to $6.32 per share of the Company’s common stock. As a result, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value of the conversion features on the date of the agreement. On the date of the transaction, the fair value of the Forward Investments convertible notes conversion feature did not change and as such, no change in fair value of derivative instruments was recorded on the consolidated statement of operations.

  

On October 26, 2015, the ratchet-down feature within the original agreement was triggered and the conversion price of the convertible notes was reset to $5.00 per share of the Company’s common stock. Prior to the triggering of the ratchet-down feature, the Company revalued the derivative and recorded a gain on fair value of derivative liabilities of $120 on the consolidated statement of operations. The Company then reduced the existing derivative liability related to the reset provision and recorded the change of $2,310 in the derivative liability value as a loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations.

 

On December 29, 2015, the ratchet-down feature within the original agreement was triggered and the conversion price of the convertible notes was reset to $3.12 per share of the Company’s common stock. Prior to the triggering of the ratchet-down feature, the Company revalued the derivative and recorded a gain on fair value of derivative liabilities of $3,380 on the consolidated statement of operations. The Company then reduced the existing derivative liability related to the reset provision and recorded the change of $4,140 in the derivative liability value as a loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations.

 

On June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of the conversion feature of the Forward Investments, LLC loans was $510 and $791, respectively, which was included in derivative financial instrument at estimated fair value on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. The change in fair value of the Forward Investments, LLC derivative liabilities was recorded as a gain the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations of $4 and $281 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. The change in the fair value of the Forward Investments, LLC derivative liabilities was recorded as a gain in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations of $4,156 and $6,148 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

 

The fair value of the Forward Investments, LLC derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30, 2017   December 31, 2016 
Principal amount and accrued interest  $1,744   $543   $1,192   $5,021   $3,210   $390   $1,025   $4,373 
                                         
Conversion price per share  $3.12   $3.12   $3.12   $3.12   $3.12   $3.12   $3.12   $3.12 
Risk free rate   1.89%   1.89%   1.14%   1.14%   1.93%   1.93%   0.51%   0.85%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   4.5    4.5    0.0    0.5    5.0    5.0    0.3    1.0 
Volatility   148%   148%   141%   220%   100%   100%   135%   120%

 

Dominion Capital LLC August 6, 2015 Demand Promissory Note – Senior Convertible Note Embedded Features

 

On August 6, 2015, the Company entered into a senior convertible note agreement with the investor whereby the Company issued a promissory note in the original principal amount of $2,105, with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, which matured on January 6, 2017. The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On August 6, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $524 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability. The debt discounts were being amortized over the life of the loan.

 

 33 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

On December 31, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible note and determined the fair value to be $176. As a result of the conversion of the outstanding principal balance (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail), the fair value of the corresponding derivative liability was $0 as of June 30, 2017. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $176 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company recorded a gain of $78 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

 

The fair value of the demand promissory note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   December 31,
2016
 
Principal amount  $1,198 
      
Conversion price per share  $5.00 
Conversion trigger price per share   None  
Risk free rate   0.44%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   0.10 
Volatility   135%

 

Dominion Capital LLC November 4, 2016 Exchange Agreement – Senior Convertible Debt Features

 

On November 4, 2016, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with the holder of the September 15, 2016 term promissory note. The principal amount was increased by $40, and the note became convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock. The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $0.40, or (ii) 75% of the lowest VWAP day for the 15 days prior to the conversion date (for additional detail refer to Note 8, Term Loans). The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On November 4, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $242 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.

 

On June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible note and determined the fair value to be $552 and $78, respectively. The Company recorded a loss of $151 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and a loss of $474 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

The fair value of the senior convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
   December 31,
2016
 
Principal amount and guaranteed interest  $670   $605 
           
Conversion price per share  $0.40   $0.40 
Conversion trigger price per share    None      None  
Risk free rate   1.14%   0.76%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   0.35    0.80 
Volatility   213%   120%

 

Dominion Capital LLC January 31, 2017 – Senior Convertible Debt Features

 

On January 31, 2017, the Company entered into a senior convertible promissory note with Dominion Capital, LLC in the original principal amount of $70, with interest accruing at the rate of 6% per annum, which matures on January 31, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $0.40 or (ii) 80% of the lowest VWAP in the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date. (for additional detail refer to Note 8, Term Loans). The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On January 31, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $38 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.

 

 34 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

On June 30, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible note and determined the fair value to be $67. The Company recorded a loss of $24 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and a loss of $29 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

The fair value of the senior convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
 
Principal amount and guaranteed interest  $78 
      
Conversion price per share  $0.40 
Conversion trigger price per share    None  
Risk free rate   1.14%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   0.60 
Volatility   210%

 

Smithline Senior Convertible Note Embedded Features

 

On August 6, 2015, the Company issued to Smithline a senior convertible note in the principal amount of $526, with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, which matures on January 11, 2017. The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On August 6, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $131 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability. The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loan.

 

On July 20, 2016 and September 1, 2016, principal of $55 and $97, respectively, was added to the Smithline senior convertible note (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for additional detail).

 

On June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible noted and determined the fair value to be $50 and $0, respectively. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as a loss and gain of $26 and $18, respectively. The Company recorded the change in fair value of the derivative liability for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as a loss and gain of $50 and $85, respectively.

 

The fair value of the Smithline derivative at June 30, 2017 was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
 
     
Principal amount and accrued interest  $149 
      
Conversion price per share  $5.00 
Conversion trigger price per share    None  
Risk free rate   1.14%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   0.25 
Volatility   213%

 

 35 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. Senior Secured Convertible Debenture Features

 

On December 29, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with JGB Waltham whereby the Company issued to JGB Waltham, for gross proceeds of $7,500, a 10% original issue discount senior secured convertible debenture in the aggregate principal amount of $7,500. The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On December 29, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $1,479 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability. The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loan. 

 

On May 17, 2016, the Company entered into the Debenture Forbearance Agreement with JGB Waltham pursuant to which JGB Waltham agreed to forbear action with respect to certain existing defaults in accordance with the terms of the Debenture Forbearance Agreement (Refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further details). The Company evaluated the Debenture Forbearance Agreement and accounted for the transaction as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Debenture Forbearance Agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $1,154 to its consolidated statement of operations on May 17, 2016. 

 

On May 23, 2016, the Company entered into the Amended Agreement with JGB Concord, JGB Waltham, VaultLogix, and the Guarantors. The Company accounted for this Amended Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company accounted for the Amended Agreement as a debt modification and utilized a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value of the settlement features. The Company recorded a loss on the fair value of the settlement features to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $41 on the consolidated statement of operations as of May 23, 2016. 

 

On June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Amended Agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $486 to its consolidated statement of operations on June 23, 2016. 

 

On September 1, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the December Debenture as a debt modification in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Amended Agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a gain to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $1,552 to its consolidated statement of operations on September 1, 2016.

 

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the JGB Waltham debenture as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $1,752 to its unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

On March 9, 2017, JGB (Cayman) Waltham entered into an Assignment and Assumption agreement with MEF I, LP (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the assumption agreement in regards to the JGB Waltham debenture as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $349 to its unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017. 

 

On June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible notes issued to JGB Waltham and determined the fair value to be $2,941 and $533, respectively. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as a loss and gain of $123 and $486, respectively. The Company recorded the change in fair value of the derivative liability for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as a loss and gain of $2,408 and $1,436, respectively, which includes all extinguishment accounting for the periods in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. These changes were recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. 

 

 36 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The fair value of the JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
   December 31,
2016
 
Principal amount  $4,451   $5,034 
           
Conversion price per share  $0.16   $0.80 
Conversion trigger price per share    None    $8.00 
Risk free rate   1.38%   1.31%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   1.92    2.41 
Volatility   141%   100%

 

JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. 2.7 Note Convertible Debenture Features

 

On September 1, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the 2.7 Note as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Amended Agreement and determined that the fair value of the features was $1,200 as of September 1, 2016 and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability. The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loan.

 

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $141 to its unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

On June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement feature of the 2.7 Note and determined the fair value to be $243 and $119, respectively. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $55 for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The Company recorded a loss on fair value of derivative instruments of $124 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, which includes all extinguishment accounting for the periods in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. These changes were recorded on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

  

The fair value of the JGB Waltham derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
   December 31,
2016
 
Principal amount  $503   $593 
           
Conversion price per share  $0.16   $0.80 
Conversion trigger price per share    None    $8.00 
Risk free rate   1.03%   0.62%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   0.17    0.58 
Volatility   213%   130%

 

JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. Senior Secured Convertible Note

 

On February 17, 2016, the Company entered into a securities exchange agreement by and among the Company, VaultLogix, and JGB Concord, whereby the Company exchanged the White Oak Global Advisors, LLC promissory note and subsequently assigned to the lender party a new 8.25% senior secured convertible note dated February 18, 2016 in the aggregate principal amount of $11,601 (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further details).

 

The Company evaluated the senior secured convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On February 18, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $1,350 related to the conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability. The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loan.

  

 37 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

On May 17, 2016, the Company entered into the Note Forbearance Agreement with JGB Concord pursuant to which JGB Concord agreed to forbear action with respect to certain existing defaults in accordance with the terms of the Note Forbearance Agreement (Refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further details). The Company evaluated the Note Forbearance Agreement and accounted for the transaction as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Note Forbearance Agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $2,196 to its consolidated statement of operations on May 17, 2016.

 

On May 23, 2016, the Company entered into the Amended Agreement with JGB Concord, JGB Waltham, VaultLogix, and the Guarantors. The Company accounted for this Amended Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company accounted for the Amended Agreement as a debt modification and utilized a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value of the settlement features. The Company recorded a loss on the fair value of the settlement features to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $79 on the consolidated statement of operations as of May 23, 2016.

 

On June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Amended Agreement to determine the fair value. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $924 to its consolidated statement of operations on June 23, 2016.

 

As part of the June 23, 2016 amended agreement with JGB Concord, the Company issued 225,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on June 23, 2016 to JGB Concord (Refer to Note 11, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further detail), and agreed to a make-whole provision whereby the Company will pay JGB Concord in cash the difference between $3.76 per share of the Company’s common stock and the average volume weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock sixty days after shares of the Company’s common stock are freely tradable. The Company accounted for the make-whole provision within the June 23, 2016 amendment agreement as a derivative liability and utilized a binomial lattice model to ascribe a value of $280, which was recorded as a derivative liability on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and as a loss on extinguishment of debt on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations on June 23, 2016.

 

On September 1, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Amended Agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a gain to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $1,308 to its consolidated statement of operations on September 1, 2016.

 

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the JGB Concord Debenture as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a gain to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $2 to its unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

On June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior secured convertible notes and determined the fair value to be $159 and $397, respectively. The Company recorded the change in fair value of derivative instruments for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as a loss of $7 and $1,671, respectively. The Company recorded the change in fair value of derivative instruments for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as a gain and loss of $238 and $2,949, respectively, which includes all extinguishment accounting for the periods in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. These changes were recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

The fair value of the JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30, 2017   December 31,
2016
 
Principal amount  $241   $3,749 
           
Conversion price per share  $0.16   $0.80 
Conversion trigger price per share    None    $8.00 
Risk free rate   1.38%   1.31%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   1.92    2.41 
Volatility   141%   100%

 

 38 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

JGB Concord Make-Whole Provision

 

On December 31, 2016, the Company used a binomial lattice model to value the make-whole provision and determined the fair value to be $819. Proceeds from the January 31, 2017 sale of the Company’s Highwire subsidiary were used to pay the remaining balance of the make-whole provision. On February 28, 2017, the Company used a binomial lattice model to value the make-whole provision and determined the fair value to be $814. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $5 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

The fair value of the JGB Concord make-whole provision at the measurement date was calculated using a binomial lattice model with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   December 31,
2016
 
Fair value of Company’s common stock  $0.12 
Volatility   120%
Exercise price   3.76 
Estimated life   0.15 
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)   0.48%

 

February 28, 2017 JGB Waltham Warrant

 

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a securities exchange agreement with JGB Waltham whereby the Company issued a warrant giving JGB Waltham the right to purchase from the Company shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of up to $1,000. The warrant expires on November 28, 2018 and contains a cashless exercise feature. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.16 until May 29, 2017 and the lower of (a) $0.16 and (b) 80% of the lowest daily price of our common stock for the prior 30 days thereafter. On February 28, 2017, the Company used a binomial lattice calculation to value the warrants. The Company ascribed a value of $65 related to the warrants and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.

 

On June 30, 2017, the Company used a binomial lattice calculation to value the warrants and determined the fair value to be $1,399. The Company recorded a loss of $1,007 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The Company recorded a loss of $1,334 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

The fair value of the warrants at the measurement date was calculated using a binomial lattice calculation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
 
Fair value of Company’s common stock  $0.12 
Volatility   197%
Exercise price   0.16 
Estimated life   1.50 
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)   1.24%

 

MEF I, L.P. Assignment and Assumption Agreement

 

On March 9, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with MEF I, L.P. pursuant to an assignment and assumption agreement (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for additional detail on the assignment). The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $0.16 or (ii) 80% of the lowest VWAP in the 30 trading days prior to the conversion date. The Company evaluated the convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On March 9, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $250 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability. The Company recorded a debt discount of $50 and debt issuance costs of $50, which are being amortized over the life of the loan.

 

On June 30, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value to be $369. The Company recorded a loss of $99 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The Company recorded a loss of $119 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

 39 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The fair value of the convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
 
Principal amount and guaranteed interest  $558 
      
Conversion price per share  $0.12 
Conversion trigger price per share    None  
Risk free rate   1.38%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   1.92 
Volatility   141%

 

SRFF Warrant and Derivative

 

On September 8, 2016, the Company issued a warrant to purchase up to a total of 625,000 shares of common stock at any time on or prior to April 1, 2017. The exercise price of the warrant is $0.004. The warrant was issued in consideration for the outstanding accounts payable to the holder of the warrant. Based on the agreement, the proceeds from the eventual sale of the common stock based on the exercise of all or a portion of the warrant will be applied towards unpaid invoices for services previously rendered to the Company. The Company determined that the fair value of the warrants was $460, which was included in common stock warrants within the stockholders’ deficit section on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.

 

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the warrant value became less than the accounts payable owed. As a result, a derivative had to be recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 in accordance with ASC 480.

 

As of June 30, 2017, the Company did not have sufficient authorized shares for the remaining equity warrants to qualify as equity. Per ASC 815-40-35-9, the Company reclassified these warrants to a derivative liability at their fair value as of March 31, 2017. Based on a warrant to purchase up to a total of 625,000 shares of common stock and an underlying price of $0.12 per share, the Company recorded these warrants at fair value of $75 on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017.

 

On June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company used a binomial lattice model to value the warrant derivative and determined the fair value to be $165 and $152, respectively. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $24 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $61 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

On April 1, 2017, the expiration date was extended until September 30, 2017.

 

The fair value of the warrant derivative as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was calculated using a binomial lattice pricing model with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
   December 31,
2016
 
Fair value of Company’s common stock  $0.12   $0.12 
Volatility   192%   120%
Exercise price   0.004    0.004 
Estimated life   0.25    0.25 
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)   1.03%   0.57%

 

 40 

 

  

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

Reclassification of Equity Warrants

 

As of June 30, 2017, the Company did not have sufficient authorized shares for the existing equity warrants to qualify as equity. Per ASC 815-40-35-9, the Company reclassified these warrants to derivative liabilities at their fair value as of March 31, 2017. These warrants are outstanding to GPB Life Science Holdings, LLC, 8760 Enterprises, Inc., and the JGB entities.

 

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants as of March 31, 2017 to be as follows:

 

  De minimis for GPB Warrant-1, GPB Warrant-2, and GPB Warrant-3;
     
  2 for the 8760 Enterprises, Inc. warrant; and
     
  $33 for the JGB warrant.

 

On June 27, 2017, the 8760 Enterprises, Inc. warrant was cancelled. The Company used a binomial lattice pricing model to value the settlement features of this equity warrant as of June 27, 2017 and determined the fair value to be $0. The Company recorded the change in fair value in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations as a gain of $2.

 

On June 30, 2017, the Company used a binomial lattice pricing model to value the settlement features of the remaining equity warrants and determined the fair value to be as follows:

 

  De minimis for GPB Warrant-1, GPB Warrant-2, and GPB Warrant-3;
     
  $30 for the JGB warrant.

 

The Company recorded the change in fair value of the JGB Warrant in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations as a gain of $3.

 

The fair value of these warrants as of June 30, 2017 was calculated using a binomial lattice pricing model with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   GPB Warrant-1   GPB Warrant-2   GPB Warrant-3   JGB Exchange Warrants 
   June 30,
2017
   June 30,
2017
   June 30,
2017
   June 30,
2017
   June 30,
2017
 
Fair value of Company’s common stock  $0.12   $0.12   $0.12   $0.12   $0.12 
Volatility   105%   105%   103%   137%   137%
Exercise price   7.00    7.00    7.00    0.04    0.40 
Estimated life   1.43    1.48    1.87    0.50    0.50 
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)   1.31%   1.31%   1.31%   1.14%   1.14%

 

 41 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

RDW 2.5% Convertible Promissory Note

 

On April 3, 2017, Scott Davis assigned 100% of his promissory note in the original principal amount of $250, reduced to $225 based on a $25 conversion into common stock, to RDW. This note was convertible at a price of $8.88 and was due on demand. As consideration for the assignment RDW paid Scott Davis $40. RDW then exchanged this original note for a new 2.5% convertible promissory note with a principal amount of $100 due April 3, 2018. This conversion price in effect on any conversion date shall be equal to 75% of the average of the five lowest VWAPS over the seven trading days prior to the date of conversion. The Company evaluated the convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On April 25, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $39 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.

 

On June 30, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value to be $39.

 

The fair value of the convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:

 

   June 30,
2017
 
Principal amount and guaranteed interest  $103 
      
Conversion price per share  $0.12 
Conversion trigger price per share    None  
Risk free rate   1.02%
Life of conversion feature (in years)   0.76 
Volatility   184%

 

10. INCOME TAXES

 

Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, provide for annual limitations on the utilization of net operating loss and credit carryforwards if the Company were to undergo an ownership change, as defined in Section 382 of the Code. In general, an ownership change occurs whenever the percentage of the shares of a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by 5-percent shareholders, as defined in Section 382 of the Code, increases by more than 50 percent over the lowest percentage of the shares of such corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by such 5-percent shareholders at any time over the preceding three years. In the event such ownership change occurs, the annual limitation may result in the expiration of the net operating losses prior to full utilization. The Company has completed a study to assess whether an ownership change has occurred or whether there have been multiple ownership changes since the Company became a “loss corporation” under the Code. As disclosed, the Company has taken these limitations into account in determining its available NOL’s.

 

During 2012 and 2013, the Company acquired 100% of a Puerto Rican limited liability company, thereby subjecting the Company to Puerto Rico income taxes on any Puerto Rico-sourced taxable income. Such taxes paid are considered foreign taxes that may be credited against federal income taxes payable in future years.

 

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has completed its examination of the Company’s 2013 Federal Corporation Income tax Return. The Company has agreed to certain adjustments proposed by the IRS and is appealing others. Separately, the IRS has questioned the Company’s classification of certain individuals as independent contractors rather than employees. The Company estimates its potential liability to be $125 but the liability, if any, upon final disposition of these matters is uncertain.

 

 42 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

11. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

Common Stock:

 

Purchase of treasury shares

 

During January 2017, the Company repurchased 81,668 shares at par value of $0.0001 per share from employees who terminated employment.

 

During April 2017, the Company repurchased 10,384 shares at par value of $0.0001 per share from employees who terminated employment.

 

Cancellation of shares

 

During March 2017, 1,694,373 shares issued to Dominion Capital LLC during 2016 were cancelled.

 

Issuance of shares of common stock to non-employees for services

 

During January 2017, the Company issued 125,000 shares of its common stock to an investor relations firm for services provided to the Company. The shares were valued at fair value at $0.10 per share and were immediately vested. The Company recorded $12 to salaries and wages expense on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

 

Issuance of shares of common stock to employees and directors for services

 

During January 2017, the Company issued 1,300,000 shares of its common stock to employees and directors for services performed. The shares were valued at fair value of $0.07 per share and vest on varying schedules through January 26, 2020. The Company recorded $1 to salaries and wages expense on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

 

Issuance of shares pursuant to Dominion Capital LLC promissory notes

 

During January 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,627,593 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of $333 of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.06 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.

 

During February 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,750,181 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of $357 of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.05 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.

 

During March 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 13,332,254 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of $528 of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.04 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.

 

Issuance of shares pursuant to Forward Investments, LLC promissory notes

 

During January 2017, the Company issued 7,848,973 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $582 principal amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.07 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.

 

During February 2017, the Company issued 11,881,352 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $867 principal amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.07 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.

 

During March 2017, the Company issued 20,759,848 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $1,112 principal amount and $254 accrued interest of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.07 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.

 

Issuance of shares pursuant to JGB Concord senior secured convertible debenture

 

During January 2017, the Company issued 4,286,262 shares of common stock to JGB Concord pursuant to conversion of $290 principal amount and $1 of accrued interest related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at $0.07 per share, per the terms of the note payable.

 

 43 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

During February 2017, the Company issued 779,634 shares of common stock to JGB Concord pursuant to conversion of $45 principal amount and $1 of accrued interest related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at $0.06 per share, per the terms of the note payable.

 

During March 2017, the Company issued 16,366,216 shares of common stock to JGB Concord pursuant to conversion of $615 principal amount and $1 of accrued interest related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at $0.04 per share, per the terms of the note payable.

 

Issuance of shares pursuant to Smithline senior convertible promissory note

 

During February 2017, the Company issued 457,615 shares of its common stock to Smithline upon the conversion of $23 of principal of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.05 per share, per the terms of the note payable.

 

During March 2017, the Company issued 5,395,111 shares of its common stock to Smithline upon the conversion of $223 of principal of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.04 per share, per the terms of the note payable.

 

Issuance of shares pursuant to MEF I, L.P. convertible promissory note

 

During March 2017, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock to MEF I, L.P. upon the conversion of $18 principal amount and $1 of accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.04 per share, per the terms of the note payable.

 

12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

Restricted Stock

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock activity during the six months ended June 30, 2017:

 

       Weighted Average 
   Number of   Grant Date 
   Shares   Fair Value 
Outstanding at January 1, 2017   722,097   $6.56 
Granted   1,300,000    0.07 
Vested   (229,542)   2.37 
Forfeited/Cancelled   (81,980)   3.70 
Outstanding at March 31, 2017   1,710,575   $2.33 
           
Vested   (371,928)   15.73 
Forfeited/Cancelled   (10,384)   8.90 
Outstanding at June 30, 2017   1,328,263   $(1.47)

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not incur stock compensation expense from the issuance of common stock to employees and consultants. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $13 and $71, respectively, in stock compensation expense from the issuance of common stock to employees and consultants.

 

The Company recorded an additional $490 and $632 in stock compensation expense on shares subject to vesting terms in previous periods during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recorded an additional $977 and $1,309 in stock compensation expense on shares subject to vesting terms in previous periods during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Options

 

There were no options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

 

 44 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity and related information for the six months ended June 30, 2017:

 

       Weighted Average     
           Remaining   Aggregate 
   Shares Underlying   Exercise   Contractual Term   Intrinsic
Value
 
   Options   Price   (in years)   (in thousands) 
Outstanding at January 1, 2017   43,750   $14.88    5.29   $646 
Granted   -    -    -    - 
Forfeited and expired   (2,083)   14.88    -    - 
Exercised   -    -    -    - 
Outstanding at June 30, 2017   41,667   $14.88    4.80   $- 
Exercisable at June 30, 2017   41,667   $14.88    4.80   $- 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value for outstanding options is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 of $0.12 and $0.12, respectively.

 

13. RELATED PARTIES

 

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding the following loans due to related parties:

 

   June 30,   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
         
Promissory note issued to CamaPlan FBO Mark Munro IRA, 3% interest, maturing on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $19 and $38, respectively  $677   $658 
Promissory note issued to 1112 Third Avenue Corp, 3% interest, maturing on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $19 and $36, respectively   356    339 
Promissory note issued to Mark Munro, 3% interest, maturing on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $32 and $62, respectively   605    575 
Promissory note issued to Pascack Road, LLC, 3% interest, maturing on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $78 and $152, respectively   2,472    2,398 
Former owner of Nottingham, unsecured, 8% interest, matured on May 30, 2016   -    225 
    4,110    4,195 
Less: current portion of debt   (4,110)   (225)
Long-term portion of notes payable, related parties  $-   $3,970 

 

The interest expense, including amortization of debt discounts, associated with the related-party notes payable in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $212 and $244, respectively. The interest expense, including amortization of debt discounts, associated with the related-party notes payable in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $316 and $491, respectively.

 

All notes payable to related parties are subordinate to the JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. and JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. term loan notes. 

 

Related Party Promissory Notes to Mark Munro, CamaPlan FBO Mark Munro IRA, 1112 Third Avenue Corp, and Pascack Road, LLC

 

On July 25, 2017, $4,258 of related party debt was exchanged by the debt holders into restricted equity (refer to Note 16, Subsequent Events, for further detail).

 

 45 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

Convertible Promissory Note to Scott Davis, Former Owner of Nottingham

 

On July 1, 2014, the Company issued an unsecured $250 convertible promissory note to Scott Davis, who is a related party. The note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum, matures on January 1, 2015 and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $26.36. The note is currently outstanding and payable on demand. The Company evaluated the convertible feature and determined that the value was de minimis and as such, the Company did not bifurcate the convertible feature.

 

On March 25, 2015, the Company and Mr. Davis agreed to a modification of the convertible promissory note. The term of the note was extended to May 30, 2016, the initial conversion price was amended to $8.88 per share of the Company’s common stock and, in consideration for this modification, the Company issued to Mr. Davis 5,556 shares of common stock with a fair value of $8.64 per share.

 

On May 31, 2015, Mr. Davis converted $25 of principal amount due into 2,816 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $14.12 per share and recorded a loss on debt conversion of $13 on the consolidated statement of operations.

 

On May 30, 2016, the note matured and was due on demand.

 

On April 3, 2017, Scott Davis assigned the full outstanding amount of the note to a third party (refer to Note 8, Term Loans, for additional detail).

 

Loans to Employees

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued loans to four employees totaling $928. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding loans to these employees with total principal of $928. These loans are collateralized by shares of the Company’s common stock held by the employees. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the value of the collateral was below the principal value. As a result, the Company recorded a reserve for the balance of $891 on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (refer to Note 4, Loans Receivable, for further detail).

 

14. SEGMENTS

 

The Company operates in three reportable segments: applications and infrastructure, professional services, and managed services. The Company identified its operating segments based on the services provided by its various operations and the financial information used by its chief operating decision maker to make decisions regarding the allocation of resources to and the financial performance of the operating segments. The reporting segments represent an aggregation of individual operating segments with similar economic characteristics. The applications and infrastructure operating segment is an aggregation of the component operations of TNS, the AWS Entities (sold by the Company in April 2017), Tropical, RM Leasing, and RM Engineering. The professional services operating segment is an aggregation of the operations of the ADEX Entities and SDNE (sold by the Company in May 2017). The managed services operating segment is primarily comprised of the operations of IPC.

 

In addition to the operating segments, the Company has determined that certain costs related to the general operations of the Company cannot be reasonably allocated to each individual segment. These costs are not part of the factors that the chief operating decision maker uses to calculate gross margin. As such, the Company has chosen to present those costs within a general “Corporate” line item for presentation purposes.

 

 46 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

Segment information relating to the Company’s results of continuing operations was as follows:

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
   Six months ended
June 30,
 
   2017   2016   2017   2016 
                 
Revenue by Segment                
Applications and infrastructure  $594   $6,597   $6,081   $11,832 
Professional services   4,874    11,825    11,145    18,345 
Managed services   2,653    4,172    4,845    10,046 
Total  $8,121   $22,594   $22,071   $40,223 

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
   Six months ended
June 30,
 
   2017   2016   2017   2016 
                 
Gross Profit by Segment                    
Applications and infrastructure  $187   $1,127   $1,659   $1,853 
Professional services   678    2,922    2,116    4,375 
Managed services   763    1,170    1,220    3,405 
Total  $1,628   $5,219   $4,995   $9,633 

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
   Six months ended
June 30,
 
   2017   2016   2017   2016 
                 
Operating Income (Loss) by Segment                    
Applications and infrastructure  $(1,151)  $(198)  $(886)  $(651)
Professional services   (270)   983    (4,386)   857 
Managed services   (307)   (1,198)   (1,042)   (1,044)
Corporate   (2,177)   (3,905)   (4,856)   (7,022)
Total  $(3,905)  $(4,318)  $(11,170)  $(7,860)

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
   Six months ended
June 30,
 
   2017   2016   2017   2016 
                 
Interest Expense by Segment                    
Applications and infrastructure  $5   $4   $11   $8 
Professional services   -    -    -    - 
Managed services   1    11    1    13 
Corporate   1,277    3,403    5,546    8,112 
Total  $1,283   $3,418   $5,558   $8,133 

 

 47 

 

 

INTERCLOUD SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
   Six months ended
June 30,
 
   2017   2016   2017   2016